But a Russian naval base would presumably be tagged "operator=Военно-морской
флот" - if you do not read the Cyrrillic alphabet this is illegible. In
Japan it would be "operator=海上自衛隊"
All names are opaque to computers, so we use standardized tags which can be
translated one time, instead of
sent from a phone
> On 12. Dec 2020, at 00:12, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Going out there a bit, but I could also see cases where somebody can see
> fighter jets taking off & landing, so it's obviously an Air Force base
or a Navy base, or Marines. Look for a runway if you are interested
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 08:06, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> do we really need military_service=army given that these services will
> differ according to the country? We can tag operator =United States Army or
> “United States Marine Corps” and keep lists in the wiki for standardized
> names of
Sorry, ignore me as it looks like the question had already been answered.
When I opened the message, your original question was the only thing there,
but when I answered, all the other earlier replies appeared?
No idea what's going on there? Guess gmail must be having a bad morning!
Thanks
Does each bog & marsh have it's own name, or are just different surfaces
inside one big named wetland?
Thanks
Graeme
PS & please don't get frustrated & give up on trying to make progress!
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 02:11, Anders Torger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was on this list a while back
sent from a phone
> On 10. Dec 2020, at 22:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> military_service=army
do we really need military_service=army given that these services will differ
according to the country? We can tag operator =United States Army or “United
States Marine Corps” and keep lists
Thanks I'll do it this way then, this actually works and even gets
rendered, although with OSM-Carto it becomes a name tag in each separate
part so not exactly beautiful, but the data is there.
/Anders
On 2020-12-11 18:07, Christoph Hormann wrote:
Anders Torger hat am 11.12.2020 17:07
Unfortunately I don't think that is possible.
Multipolygons may only contain ways that have either role as inner or as
outer. It may not contain other relations (still possible to upload, but
not considered right according to the wiki). What should the ways be?
We can't make the separate
Actually, there is no Rijn in Rotterdam. But that does not change the argument.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 11 dec. 2020 om 18:11 heeft Christoph Hormann het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>> Anders Torger hat am 11.12.2020 17:07 geschrieben:
>>
>> The least bad way I've come up with is to
Hello Anders,
I would recommend creating a multipolygon relation (type=multipolygon) with
each of the wetland pieces, and set the name= and appropriate natural= and
wetland= tags on the relation.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 11:11 AM Anders Torger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was on this list a while back
> Anders Torger hat am 11.12.2020 17:07 geschrieben:
>
> The least bad way I've come up with is to just name all polygons
> belonging to the same wetlands the same,
That is widely considered to be the correct way. It is established practice
that mapping things like forest, wetland,
Hello,
I was on this list a while back expressing some frustration over
limitations when tagging nature and thought about getting involved in a
process for change, but I came to realize that it's not feasible for me
in my current life situation, so I've decided to continue be a normal
mapper
It is very unusual, but I think that highway=secondary may be actually bus only.
And I would never describe highway=secondary as a special type of
highway=service
Dec 11, 2020, 14:21 by jan...@gmail.com:
> I think "service" is more appropriate than highway=secondary. Highway=service
> has in
I agree that I would probably not use highway=service in this case, I
imagine the way is important for pedestrians as well? This being said, the
current tagging with access=yes, motor_vehicle=no and bus=private seems ok
(routing will work as expected, if service roads are taken into account),
I think "service" is more appropriate than highway=secondary.
Highway=service has in my opinion a wider scope than secondary. In a way,
secondary is a special type of highway=service (that's the way I look at
it, though other mappers probably don't look at it that way). So if a road
can not be
15 matches
Mail list logo
