Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread stevea
On Dec 10, 2022, at 12:04 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 10/12/2022 18:23, Mark Wagner wrote: >> As actually used on the map, "natural=wood" and "landuse=forest" are >> synonyms. >> > Depends on the map - if there are no other tags https://map.atownsend.org.uk > will show "landuse=forest" in a

Re: [Tagging] scope of emergency=dry_riser_inlet

2022-12-10 Thread Kyle Hensel
I think we need a new tag then. In New Zealand dry risers are not allowed for new buildings, since charged systems are safer... François’s suggestion of emergency=riser_inlet + a sub tag seems like a good idea, but is it possible to deprecated an approved tag? Otherwise we need several main

Re: [Tagging] scope of emergency=dry_riser_inlet

2022-12-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 10 Dec 2022, at 10:35, Kyle Hensel wrote: > > However the wiki says “fire department connection” is a synonym of the tag. it is probably not always a synonym, it is if the riser is dry. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Andy Townsend
On 10/12/2022 18:23, Mark Wagner wrote: As actually used on the map, "natural=wood" and "landuse=forest" are synonyms. Depends on the map - if there are no other tags https://map.atownsend.org.uk will show "landuse=forest" in a lighter green to "natural=wood" (to indicate "forestry"; it also

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
10 gru 2022, 19:23 od mark+...@carnildo.com: > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:49:00 +0100 > Florian Lohoff wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 01:10:33PM +, Dave F via Tagging wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > What does plantation=yes represent? >> > Associated with woods, but nothing in the wiki. 2437 

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Enno Hermann
The usage of plantation=yes was discussed on the Carto repository recently: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4721 It is also briefly mentioned on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dplantation -eginhard On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 7:26 PM Mark

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Mark Wagner
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:49:00 +0100 Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 01:10:33PM +, Dave F via Tagging wrote: > > Hi > > > > What does plantation=yes represent? > > Associated with woods, but nothing in the wiki. 2437  uses > > worldwide. Seems too vague to be OSM useful. >

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
That was my thought at first. But maybe, forest as in "planted woodland" is not necessarily always for chopping down later, they might be planted for recreative purposes or for the air quality. Hard to tell from aerial view, though. On 10/12/2022 17:49, Florian Lohoff wrote: On Sat, Dec 10,

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 01:10:33PM +, Dave F via Tagging wrote: > Hi > > What does plantation=yes represent? > Associated with woods, but nothing in the wiki. 2437  uses worldwide. > Seems too vague to be OSM useful. Interesting - I would say natural=wood + plantation=yes is more likely

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - relation type=sled

2022-12-10 Thread Philipp Spitzer
Dear Yves and Anne! Thanks for you comments! sled vs. sledding: I agree that sledding is a better word, however as "sled" is already used for piste:type I chose to stick to that. But sure it's easy to use something else. I think it will be hard to find a lot of support for a relation type

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Timothy Noname
Wood planted to be cut down as timber, I would imagine. They tend to be boring areas with little aesthetic or environmental benefit. How forests are tagged is a huge can of worms On Sat, 10 Dec 2022, 13:15 Dave F via Tagging, wrote: > Hi > > What does plantation=yes represent? > > Associated

[Tagging] plantation=yes?

2022-12-10 Thread Dave F via Tagging
Hi What does plantation=yes represent? Associated with woods, but nothing in the wiki. 2437  uses worldwide. Seems too vague to be OSM useful. DaveF ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - relation type=sled

2022-12-10 Thread Yves via Tagging
I think it will be hard to find a lot of support for a relation type grouping sled runs, parking, restaurants, etc... All the additional features can be found easily in OSM: they are close to the run itself. For the walking parts, highway=path or else, or maybe piste:type=hike or connection

Re: [Tagging] scope of emergency=dry_riser_inlet

2022-12-10 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Kyle It is true that sometimes the riser may be permanantly pressurised with main water. At least in France, we may find inlets on those pressurised risers http://www.formationssiap.fr/colonne-seche-colonne-humide-dit-charge/ We have clear labels "colonne seche" (dry riser) and "colonne

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Street parking revision

2022-12-10 Thread Alex
I am happy to inform that the street parking revision proposal was accepted with 51 votes in favour, 2 votes against and 1 abstention. A new wiki page on street parking mapping has already been set up (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking) - it contains the new information from

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - relation type=sled

2022-12-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
Ah, fond childhood memories... Anyway, I was a bit confused about the word "sled", but I get it, now that I have seen the wiki page. How about calling it "sledding", though, in parallel to "walking" or "hiking"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sledding Regards, Anne On 10/12/2022 09:11, Philipp

[Tagging] scope of emergency=dry_riser_inlet

2022-12-10 Thread Kyle Hensel
Hi, The tag emergency=dry_riser_inlet contains the word “Dry”, which suggests that it can only be used for inlets into _dry_ riser systems. However the wiki says “fire department connection” is a synonym of the tag. This suggests that the `emergency=dry_riser_inlet` can be used for other types

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - relation type=sled

2022-12-10 Thread Yves via Tagging
Why not https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dpiste ? Sled is already documented and used for those relations. Regards, Yves Le 10 décembre 2022 10:11:39 GMT+01:00, Philipp Spitzer a écrit : >Dear all! > >I like to propose https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Sled

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - relation type=sled

2022-12-10 Thread Philipp Spitzer
Dear all! I like to propose https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Sled (which is actually a quite old proposal) which tries to overcome the shortcomings of piste:type=sled (without replacing it). I would be happy if you could provide thoughts/comments in the corresponding