Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Cell Phone Reception

2023-08-08 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 07:18:29PM +, NickKatchur via Tagging wrote: > Hello, > > I have developed a proposal to indicate the availability of cell phone > service at nodes and areas, > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cell_reception. I would consider this data much to volatile to

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Cell Phone Reception

2023-08-08 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
No, this does not fix it. The fundamental thing that you're trying to map here simply doesn't belong in OSM, the proposal will not pass, and I would advise you to stop wasting your time and everyone else's on it. OpenStreetMap is a database of verifiable facts, not scientific measurements, and th

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Cell Phone Reception

2023-08-08 Thread Marc_marc
Le 08.08.23 à 02:13, NickKatchur via Tagging a écrit : # The reduction of additional tagging models to only strength with excellent/good/low/issues/none options. imho it's already include in =no =limited =yes ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@opens

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Cell Phone Reception

2023-08-08 Thread Warin
On 8/8/23 04:32, Marc_marc wrote: Hello, Le 06.08.23 à 21:18, NickKatchur via Tagging a écrit : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cell_reception I'm a bit amused, or rather disappointed, to read comments like "it's complicated to estimate the number of reception bars because it de

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Cell Phone Reception

2023-08-08 Thread Warin
On 7/8/23 07:20, Timothy Noname wrote: I thinks it's definitely valuable to map areas where there is no coverage at all as it's a safety issue For safety sake it is best to assume there will be no cell phone coverage. The battery could go flat, the phone could be lost, drowned or damaged.