Le 13.09.23 à 19:21, Jez Nicholson a écrit :
OSM addresses are physical, 'locational' addresses
ok
it is the anomalous postal addresses that need to have their own schemeif
at all.
some mapper in France are using contact:* for that (and also
some contact:addr for a kind of number+stree
IMHO OSM addresses are physical, 'locational' addresses and it is the
anomalous postal addresses that need to have their own schemeif at all.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, 17:33 Philip Barnes, wrote:
>
>
> On 12 September 2023 10:28:11 CEST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >On 12/9/23 03:5
On 12 September 2023 10:28:11 CEST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On 12/9/23 03:57, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> The fundamental issue is that there are postal addresses and what might
>> be called "civil addresses" or "physical addresses" ('locational' I
>> understand but is not normal Engli
Am 11.09.2023 um 23:39 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick:
Not arguing, but
oneway:foot = 5024
foot:backward = 394
foot:forward = 300
Personally, I would interpret that as time that the wiki had a
rewrite! :-)
Voted by their "foot" ... ;-) - and I used it too ...
But it is already rewritten:
On M
