Re: [Tagging] Mapping terraced, irrigated farmland (e.g. rice paddies)?

Hi Joseph, retaining wall [1] is applicable to whatever area Il dom 8 nov 2020, 06:50 Joseph Eisenberg ha scritto: > Is there a specific tag or method for mapping terraced farmland? > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dretaining_wall >

[Tagging] Surveillance camera angle

Hello! What is "camera:angle"? Taginfo [1] lists values consistent both to field-of-view and inclination. I cannot find wiki, just discussion and a proposal status [2]. [1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/camera%3Aangle#values [2]

Re: [Tagging] Route names that aren’t names

Il giorno sab 28 mar 2020 alle ore 19:19 Richard Fairhurst < rich...@systemed.net> ha scritto: > > Hello folks, > Route relation names aren’t in a great state, are they? > > The upshot: bad luck if you want to render the actual names of routes on a map. You can’t. Well, if somebody takes care of

[Tagging] Landfills timespan

Hello, I've an OSM compatible dataset that helps me to spot landfills. Older ones are already covered by grass and/or trees. IMHO could be useful to save landfill locations for a future possible use. Does it make sense tag the ones with surface alterations with level=-1 ? Or shall I consider

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an utilitarian fountain?

Il giorno mer 5 feb 2020 alle ore 23:07 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging ha scritto: > And amenity=drinking_water may be combined with them (except of unfortunate > case of fountain). Since fountain is intended as "sculptural and/or decorational", IMHO amenity=fountain is not consistent. AFAIK

Re: [Tagging] Active volcanoes

So "active" is ment in geological time... rather wide for OSM :-) How to tag its recent activity, ie for touristic purposes? Il ven 24 gen 2020, 14:40 Christoph Hormann ha scritto: > On Friday 24 January 2020, Cascafico Giovanni wrote: > > > > Which is the

[Tagging] Active volcanoes

vHello ML! this query [1] is supposed to display active volcanes. I made some research using Sentinel-2 browser, but it happens that most volcanoes doesn't have an infrared response [2]. Which is the criteria to tag volcanoes as volcano:status=active? [1] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Q3E [2]

Re: [Tagging] Public WLAN boxes

Il mer 18 dic 2019, 16:48 Tom Pfeifer ha scritto: > > The 'box' would contain a full access point and not just the antenna, thus > I'd prefer not to tag the > antenna alone. > So how to tag the whole hardware? Shall I refer to Key:communication:radio:repeater? >

[Tagging] Public WLAN boxes

Hello ML, which tags for those boxes, usually on pole or wall mounted which provide free public WLAN access? In my area they are managed by municipality and are subject to registration. My tagging would be: man_made=antenna operator=Comune di Cividale del Friuli antenna:application=wlan

[Tagging] craft VS man_made

Hello ML! in Italy there are several small processing companies catalogued as artisans, mostly in categories like food processing (meat, biscuits, milk, etc), which don't run a shop (or shop is a minor business). Reading the wikis, I understand that, depending on business volumes, I should go

Re: [Tagging] Mapping deforestation wikipage proposal

Lorenzo, if your project aims to track deforestation in a timespan, IMHO you had better to focus on trees only. Trying to guess which landuse is going to replace trees is hard. I'd start from an AOI entirely mapped with forest, wood or, in doubt, the generic landcover=trees all of which derived

Re: [Tagging] Hotel dataset import? / Re: Baby-sitting

> Il giorno mer 13 mar 2019 alle ore 12:16 Tom Pfeifer < t.pfei...@computer.org> ha scritto: > I think you misunderstand. OSM is based on locally sourced, handcrafted data. That creates the high quality Have youi ever seen hot tasks results? Huge building polys, mixed misalignments, nonxistent

Re: [Tagging] Hotel dataset import? / Re: Baby-sitting

> > Il giorno lun 11 mar 2019 alle ore 14:11 Mateusz Konieczny < > matkoni...@tutanota.com> ha scritto: > > Fixed in > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import=1820348=1551233 > > I took a 600+ dataset, geocoded them, manually conflate 53 of them, put source references on umap, put

Re: [Tagging] Hotel dataset import? / Re: Baby-sitting

Il giorno lun 11 mar 2019 alle ore 12:20 Cascafico Giovanni < cascaf...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > You were criticized for stretching the opening_hours syntax to describe > seasonal operations ("Jan 01 > > - Dec 31"), but did not respond nor adjust your tagging. >

Re: [Tagging] Hotel dataset import? / Re: Baby-sitting

Il giorno sab 9 mar 2019 alle ore 22:15 Tom Pfeifer ha scritto: > I have severe problems with your process. First, yes it is an import. You called it an import > yourself ("manually importing") here, and on the Italien list where you first asked about the > tagging. > Where did you see a "100

Re: [Tagging] Hotel dataset import? / Re: Baby-sitting

[1] http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/map/turismo-fvg_295722 Il sab 9 mar 2019, 12:18 Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: > In short (I'm on phone)... > Please find here [1] umap used for manual conflation. For source data and > license, follow footer info link. > > AFAIK <10

Re: [Tagging] Hotel dataset import? / Re: Baby-sitting

In short (I'm on phone)... Please find here [1] umap used for manual conflation. For source data and license, follow footer info link. AFAIK <100 nodes don't fall in import category. Il sab 9 mar 2019, 11:46 Tom Pfeifer ha scritto: > On 09.03.2019 10:10, Cascafico Giovanni wrote: &g

Re: [Tagging] Baby-sitting

Well, hotels dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean baby-sitting field (as for "pets" in other ML thread). I think that a generic info is better than no info, particularly if hotel features childcare=yes and whatever contact tag. Il ven 8 mar 2019, 20:45 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: >

[Tagging] Baby-sitting

How can I tag an hotel which features baby-sitting? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Pets allowed

Unfortunately dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean "pets" field. I guess if go for "dogs" it will be 9/10 right, while a generic "pets" 99/100 (considering the alligator anomaly :-) The latter has less taginfo popularity, but better fits source data. Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake

[Tagging] Pets allowed

Hello ML! how can I tag and hotel (or whatever) that allows pets? Besides, semi-OT, if hotel offers babysitting, is childcare=yes ok? I briefly googled in OSM wiki and couldn't find. If already answered, please forgive me. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Estimated values for height

In source dataset there is no field for accuracy. I'd go for the simplest solution, height=* note="height is estimated, please improve" ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Estimated values for height

I'm going to import a small dataset of trees. Some tree heights are defined as "measured", some as "estimated". About estimated values, I've found a wiki definition only for width [1]: shall I derive an est_height tag, go for most popular taginfo solutions, simply assign an estimated value to

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-26 2:17 GMT+02:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 19:27, Cascafico Giovanni > wrote: > >> Got it. >> >> +5k nodes imported without brand key >> > > Great! :-) > > Thanks > Hello, my mistake... a previous version of .

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

Got it. +5k nodes imported without brand key Il 25 ago 2018 12:16 AM, "Graeme Fitzpatrick" ha scritto: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 18:29, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >> >> > On 24. Aug 2018, at 09:57, Cascafico Giovanni >> wrote: >> &g

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

The issue is: do we really want to drop unfranchising information? nobrand=yes tag seems reasonable: how can it damage the quality of import? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

Martin: > “pompe bianche” is a meta category you will not find on the ground in this part either, rather there will be signs with brands you never heard about. > I would leave brands that are already there, and would not tag nobrand=yes because there is some kind of brand.I'm quoting to brand

[Tagging] nobrand

Hello, I'm going to upload 20k amenity=fuel in Italy; 5k of them are "Pompe Bianche", which means their don't belong to any brand. Which solution fits best? 1) brand=Pompe Bianche 2) brand=independent 3) brand:it=Pompe Bianche brand=independent 4) nobrand=yes ...