While it is true that tags here are based on British English, it is also
true that there are mappers from all over the world that are dissatisfied
because of the narrowness offered by the English language when describing
certain things.
There was recently a discussion among Spanish mappers on how
Hi everyone,
I think that this case and my dehesas pose the same problem, which is that
the current collection of possible landuses is too narrow. In my opinion
there are three options:
a) Expand the number of landuse values to adapt to different realities in
other parts of the world. Apart from
Hi again,
How about landuse=mixed_rural? Would that be useful to areas you know about?
Best regards
Diego
El mar., 3 sept. 2019 a las 16:48, Diego Cruz ()
escribió:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Thank you for your replies!
>
> I'm not so happy about the idea of having three different
Hi everybody,
Thank you for your replies!
I'm not so happy about the idea of having three different landuse tags that
in most cases will be rendered incorrectly. Besides, how can you know what
is the main use and what is the secondary one? The thing is that this is a
mixed system, and in Spain an
ars to be a specific type of farmland, so landuse=farmland +
> farmland=dehesa would say it all and disrupt nothing.
>
> Mvg Peter Elderson
>
> Op 31 aug. 2019 om 12:25 heeft Diego Cruz het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Cristoph,
>
> Thank you for your feedback,
l vie., 30 ago. 2019 a las 12:00, Christoph Hormann ()
escribió:
> On Friday 30 August 2019, Diego Cruz wrote:
> >
> > I have recently proposed a new tag in the Wiki, because none of the
> > existing landuse tags seem to match it. A dehesa is a type of land
> > that combi
Hi everyone,
This is the first time I use this mailing list, so please excuse me if I'm
accidentally ignoring any step in the proceedings.
I have recently proposed a new tag in the Wiki, because none of the
existing landuse tags seem to match it. A dehesa is a type of land that
combines a forest
