Hi,
we have a big inconsistency between different wiki pages and editors how we
define the roof shape "saltbox".
1) A saltbox is a roof with a tilted part at left and right side and a flat
part on top. This definition can be found at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
It
The only pedestrian lane that I know, in my German hometown, is separated from
the rest of the road by a solid line. So it's not legal for vehicles to drive
on it.
Michael
Am So., Nov. 3, 2019 at 8:20 schrieb Martin
Koppenhoefer:
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 2 nov 2019, alle ore
Hi,
I agree that advertising is not a fitting key. I could only find these:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=traffic_information_display
(18 uses)https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=variable_message_sign
(9 uses)
Michael
Am Mi., Okt. 30, 2019 at 3:37 schrieb
Hi,
should position=* be kept when retagging pipeline markers to the new scheme? If
yes, then this tag should be added to the wiki documentation.
Michael
Am So., Okt. 27, 2019 at 18:35 schrieb François
Lacombe: Hi all,
Voting of Utility markers proposal is now over and it was approved
to prevent overlap in case of different tags for them.
Am 25.06.2019 um 13:32 schrieb Michael Brandtner via Tagging:
I've now rewritten the whole proposal. To prevent overlap, the idea is
now to incorporate all devices that provide electrical power under the
same main tag. A problem I have
=charging_station).
Am Samstag, 22. Juni 2019, 17:41:08 MESZ hat Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Folgendes geschrieben:
Thank you for your comments so far. I've now written a proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dpower_supply
The definition (wording can surely
ated_types#International_usage_of_Type_G)
is missing.
__John
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:45 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/06/19 01:39, Michael Brandtner via Tagging wrote:
Thank you for your comments so far. I've now written a proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/P
I didn't really want to include device charging into this, but it seems that my
tag is too generic to prevent that. Maybe I should stop trying to combine the
power supplies at camping grounds and marinas and instead go with
amenity=shorepower?
Am So., Juni 23, 2019 at 3:44 schrieb
Thank you for your comments so far. I've now written a proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dpower_supply
The definition (wording can surely be improved):" A place where you can get
electrical power."
I've not taken into account your discussion about different
I've found this Wikipedia page:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorepower
There is no shore power tag in OSM yet. But now I'm uncertain if we should also
make a difference between shore power and power supply for other uses.
Am Fr., Juni 21, 2019 at 14:21 schrieb Michael Brandtner via
The sub-tag does already exist, I've linked to it in my original post
(power_supply=). What doesn't exist is a main tag for tagging isolated columns
for power supply.
This image shows what I'm talking about:
Hi,
I'm thinking about (and in fact, have already used about two times) a new tag:
amenity=power_supply. It is meant for mapping places where you can get
electrical power for a fee. They can be found at camping grounds and harbours.
They have sockets you can use to get power and you can pay
I think that this is a language issue and the hallway (German "Flur") is
meant, not the floor.
Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019, 03:11:32 MESZ hat marc marc
Folgendes geschrieben:
Hello,
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/changing_table
questions / minor suggestions
I’m against the tag baby_changing_table. As I have already written,
changing_table is unambiguous and the most common word for this thing. No need
for such a long key.
Am Donnerstag, April 25, 2019, 10:52 PM schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer
:
sent from a phone
> On 22. Apr 2019, at 01:49, marc
I don' think we should use no, but private. But as others have stated, I can't
really think of a changing table that should be mapped in osm but isn't
accessible even for customers.
But us this really a point we need to discuss? Can't we just say that
changing_table:access should be used with
Even if there is an extra room, there will be a changing table in it. and the
bench is a substitute for a changing table. So I don't find this tag limiting.
Of course there will be also a bin and a washing basin in such a room. But the
table is the most important feature, similar to
changing_table seems to be the most common term so we should use it.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/changing%20tablehttps://www.dictionary.com/browse/changing-table
Gesendet von Yahoo Mail für iPad
Am Sonntag, April 21, 2019, 9:12 AM schrieb bkil :
Here are some
I’m not a native speaker but I don’t think there will be any confusion when
using changing_table. I don’t know of any changing tables for adults outside of
nursing homes. In case of need we can add changing_table:for=adults.
Am Freitag, April 19, 2019, 11:06 PM schrieb marc marc
:
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
