But if a trail, road, or cycle tract does not have route markers for use then no route=* even if designated. -natfoot
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 17:33 Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 09:04, stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: > >> In my mind "designated" means "for this infrastructure / mode-of-travel >> pair, DO use this." Like legislatively or because a sign says so and >> quotes a local ordinance or traffic code statute. "We built this, use >> it." (Say, for your own safety and/or comfort). >> >> With "yes" you certainly can use this infrastructure for that particular >> mode-of-travel. Though, nothing more than that. >> > > I usually go along with was it designed, built, intended or signposted for > use by this mode? If so then it's designated. For example a road was > designed, built and intended for use by cars, motor_vehicle=designated but > if there's no sidewalk you can legally and physically walk on the road so > foot=yes. However some roads like a living street / shared zone, are > signposted for pedestrians to use, so we'd tag foot=designated. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
