Hello list,
There's a proposal in the wiki that money transfer agents such as Western
Union should be tagged as amenity=money_transfer.
I don't like this tag because of the over use of amenity key.
Many of the money transfer agents are banks or bureau de change, which are
amenities.
What do you
On 19 November 2012 17:39, Pieren wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Sébastien Pierrel
> wrote:
>
> > What do you think of money_transfer=agent +
> operator:money_transfer="Western
> > Union"?
>
> Do you mean "in combination with an existing a
On 19 November 2012 17:03, Eric SIBERT wrote:
> Le 19/11/2012 15:58, Janko Mihelić a écrit :
>
> Maybe something even wider like:
>>
>> service:money:transfer=yes
>> service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some
>> banks too, not only exchange bureaus)
>> service:money:
On 20 November 2012 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel :
> > What do you think of money_transfer=agent +
> operator:money_transfer="Western
> > Union"?
>
>
> I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than
On 20 November 2012 18:05, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel
>>
>>
>> I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions.
>> So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ?
>>
>> starting to get awkward...
>&g
On 20 November 2012 18:50, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
>
> 2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel
>
>>
>> What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and
>> Moneygram?
>>
>
> service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram
>
>
I don't lik
