Re: [Tagging] parking spaces limited to cars (no busses, trucks, etc.)

2011-05-01 Thread Sebastian Hohmann
Am 01.05.2011 15:13, schrieb Stefan Bethke: Am 01.05.2011 um 13:14 schrieb Sebastian Hohmann: Am 29.04.2011 22:18, schrieb Stefan Bethke: It appears that people have been using "car" as a key for this purpose. Should I use that, and add an appropriate entry below motorcar=*?

Re: [Tagging] parking spaces limited to cars (no busses, trucks, etc.)

2011-05-01 Thread Sebastian Hohmann
Am 29.04.2011 22:18, schrieb Stefan Bethke: It appears that people have been using "car" as a key for this purpose. Should I use that, and add an appropriate entry below motorcar=*? There is clearly a key needed for this class of vehicles, so why not just use "car". ___

Re: [Tagging] parking spaces limited to cars (no busses, trucks, etc.)

2011-05-01 Thread Sebastian Hohmann
Am 01.05.2011 01:30, schrieb David Murn: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:08 +0200, Sebastian Hohmann wrote: But don't forget bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes, skating=yes, dog=yes, ... But is bicycle/horse/skate/dog parking allowed? This is a discussion of how to tag limited access to parkin

Re: [Tagging] parking spaces limited to cars (no busses, trucks, etc.)

2011-04-30 Thread Sebastian Hohmann
Am 30.04.2011 16:51, schrieb David Murn: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 15:10 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 30.04.2011 um 12:10 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: 2011/4/29 Stefan Bethke: It appears that people have been using "car" as a key for this purpose. Should I use that, and add an appropriate ent

Re: [Tagging] parking spaces limited to cars (no busses, trucks, etc.)

2011-04-30 Thread Sebastian Hohmann
Am 30.04.2011 12:10, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: 2011/4/29 Stefan Bethke: It appears that people have been using "car" as a key for this purpose. Should I use that, and add an appropriate entry below motorcar=*? -1 IMHO motorcar should be defined as automobile/car, and not be used as a gen