Hi,
I was busy and couldn't participate in this very interesting
discussion.
My proposal:
- Moving all social media keys like `facebook`, `twitter`, `whatsapp`,
`telegram` etc. to a `socialmedia` namespace like
`socialmedia:facebook`, `socialmedia:twitter`, `socialmedia:whatsapp`,
`socialmedia:te
> It is clear that "contact:" despite what the wiki says, will always mean "contact", while websites, facebook pages and whatever else is suggested to be put under "contact" will not always have a contacting possibility (and will often have a broader scope than just "contact").Then we can deprecate
I request to replace all occurrence of the non-prefixed versions of the
contact keys like Key:phone, Key:email. Key:website to be replaced with the
prefixed ones like Key:contact:phone, Key:contact:email, Key:contact:website .
The current situation harms our database in a way that makes o
Will come, will come, please be patient. This is on ny ToDo list.~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (phone)From: MARLIN LUKE To: Martin Koppenhoefer ,"Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" CC:
Given th
or the OpenStreetMap Community and of course for customers.~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (phone)From: Valor Naram via Tagging To: tagging@openstreetmap.orgCC: Valor Naram Hey,I finally opened the voting
Hello all,
since the vote takes currently place, I want to use the time to comment
on some reasons given by mappers who opposed my proposal. Normally I
won't do that but my personal feel says that it's necessary here. I'm
going to use e-mail style quoting for quoting.
> Without evidence that phon
> Valor Naram, could you clarify what specific changes will be made to> the page, based on approval of this proposal? Is it just rewording, or> are there any significant changes to how the tag is used?Basically it's just a rewording and redesign but actually there are some minor differences.Specifi
Hey,
I finally opened the voting "Make `phone` Tag default for tagging
telephone numbers in OSM and deprecating contact:phone`. Please place
your voice at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Discussions/tagging/contact:phone_or_phone.
The Voting will be closed at 5th Novembre 2019. Please read t
Be sure that almost no data user will evaluate these tags~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Strange tagsFrom: ael To: tagging@openstreetmap.orgCC: On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 09:09:16PM +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote:> donald=yes> ele=821> graham=no>
So the distinction of mobile and landline is a problem. Is there any possibility to distinct between landline and mobile also in Italy?CheersSören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] [Key:phone] - Suggesting wiki page changingFrom: Martin Koppenhoefer
Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] [Key:phone] - Suggesting wiki page changingFrom: Markus To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" CC: On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, 20:51 Valor Naram via Tagging, <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:I want to change the wiki page
https://wik
I want to change the wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone throw a Proposal process
to do certain things:
- Deprecating `contact:phone`
- Promoting `phone`
- Extending `phone`
- Protecting the wiki page against "wild changes" in the interest of
the community (to maintain a
Let me summarizeWhy `phone`:- It's more used- It's shorter- Better to find in wikiWhy `contact:phone`:- It's more structured because it's a subkey of `contact`- It's better to find in wiki (for people who think in a "more structured" way)- It's the approved oneBoth let us add more subkeys like `eme
The tagging Community (this list) will negotiate it and it's the office at the same time. The process should be like the process for proposals but only discussion and vote.RegardsSören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Multiple tags for one purposeFr
Like your message (+1) marc marc Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=power_supplyFrom: marc marc To: tagging@openstreetmap.orgCC: I think you were badly inspired when you listened to the supportersof the mega proposals that fail to pass the vote
> Looks good to me, except that the tag name should really be something like "power_supply:socket_type" rather than the over-generic "power_supply".+1___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
This is a good point and should be the preferred way. For your purpose you should usehighway=pathwheelchair=designated.This tells mappers and other users of OSM data that the highway is a path https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath and designated for wheelchair users https://wiki.op
17 matches
Mail list logo
