Re: [Tagging] Geological Faults

geological=fault would be more specific and has more than 900 occurrences in the db. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/geological#values But a fault - like many geological features - usually can only be reliably determined by experts. In respect to ground verifiability geological

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - tag "motorcycle friendly" for accomodations

> Am 06.03.2017 um 18:55 schrieb Thilo Haug : > > > I (accidentally) unsubscribed because of the "spam" coming in, > means I didn't get just messages regarding the topic. > I assume others will possibly act similar. > Due to the (anachronistic) nature of a mailing list a

Re: [Tagging] What about a disused quarry and historic surface mining?

> Am 10.01.2017 um 00:04 schrieb Tom Pfeifer : > > They consist of the remaining geological material, which is of natural origin. For the remaining exposed rock we use mainly natural=bare_rock. > > There is a geological cycle as well, with mountains moving up and down,

Re: [Tagging] What about a disused quarry and historic surface mining?

> Am 09.01.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > On 10-Jan-17 07:56 AM, ksg wrote: >>> >> You might use man_made=embankment for them. Don’t use natural=cliff, as >> these features are not of natural origin. > > The 'natural' key

Re: [Tagging] What about a disused quarry and historic surface mining?

> Am 09.01.2017 um 21:23 schrieb ael : > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote: >> Please do not use "disused=yes" as it is considered troll-tagging, first >> saying it is simething, and in the next line negating it. +1 That’s what the life

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

> Am 07.12.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer : > > sent from a phone > > for me, amenity=cafe implies tables and chairs, many bars don't have tables, > just a bar. I admit that an Italian bar is different from a german cafe in almost each and every way ;)

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

> Am 07.12.2016 um 11:26 schrieb Volker Schmidt : > The situation in Italy is similar. > In my area (Veneto) they are mostly tagged as amenity=cafe, I suppose that is > because this is the most frequently served item. I guess caffe (espresso) is also the most _important_

Re: [Tagging] cave_entrance. ref and name

> Am 06.09.2016 um 09:44 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2016-09-03 14:46 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > Are there any objections to make clear on the cave entrance page that "name" > on a cave entrance object is the name of the cave

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mountaineer's mailbox

> Am 06.09.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker <wolfg...@lyxys.ka.sub.org>: > > Hi, > > * Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> [160906 20:38]: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:20 PM, ksg <ks...@web.de> wrote: >>> The tag summit:register=* is no

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mountaineer's mailbox

> Am 06.09.2016 um 20:38 schrieb Kevin Kenny : > > OK, that sounds good as well. Maybe still have some sort of tagging for the > type so that we can show a letterbox as Mr Díaz de Argandoña requests? Perfect, may be like "summit:register:letterbox=yes“? > (As I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mountaineer's mailbox

> Am 06.09.2016 um 19:55 schrieb Kevin Kenny : > > I would think that the proposal could be adapted to the thing that you > describe: 'tourism=register register:type=letterbox' or some such tagging. > What do you think? > The tag summit:register=* is not yet

Re: [Tagging] Best tagging practices for winery "tasting rooms"

> Am 05.09.2016 um 16:41 schrieb Jack Burke : > > I know of several wineries that operate a tasting room facility separate from > the winery itself. I'm trying to come up with the right tagging scheme to use > on them. Since they aren't located at the actually winery,

Re: [Tagging] artificial cave, historic military shelter

> Am 02.09.2016 um 15:43 schrieb demon.box : > > hi, how can I tag correctly this artificial cave, used like a shelter for the > austriac soldiers during the 1915-1918 first world war? > > amenity=shelter > shelter_type=rock_shelter > man_made=yes > historic=yes > > it

Re: [Tagging] cave_entrance. ref and name

> Am 30.08.2016 um 13:39 schrieb Richard : > > So what does cave:ref really mean? Should that say something like > "unique cave identifier"? > Shouldn't cave:ref be subtyped for example as "cave:ref:at" or > "cave:ref:fr" for austrian resp french ids to prevent id clashes?

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

Am 28.08.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: sent from a phone Am 28.08.2015 um 15:01 schrieb Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com: No, it can't. It _can_ be sub-tagged to have the same _access_ restrictions_ as a bridleway and cycleway, sure, and you

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

Am 06.08.2015 um 12:10 schrieb Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com: On 06/08/2015 10:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am 06.08.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com: Imagine in that example that bicycle access was permissive rather than yes - how would you tag that?