2014-12-15 15:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not
need a custom tag for it
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building
2014-12-15 17:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not
need a custom tag for it
from my experience it is mostly not the amount
2014-10-16 8:33 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
It seems that are serious problems with this tag, is there somebody
interested in
this topic who want to make a better proposal?
(1) This tag can not be used on the same object as
historic=archaeological_site -
despite the
2014-10-10 19:05 GMT+02:00 Kotya Karapetyan kotya.li...@gmail.com:
Dear all,
I would hereby like to propose a new value for the man_made tag:
man_made=water_tap
The proposal page is:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_tap
Hi,
I use
amenity=drinking_water +
On 19 Sep 2014 16:54, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
On 19.09.2014 14:22 Dan S wrote:
for buildings: building=residential + residential=university +
operator=*
OR
for sites: landuse=residential + residential=university + operator=*
Note that the same scheme
2014-07-08 11:44 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
We could use a single polygon per terminal tagged as in the proposal
(similar to other landuse types) if we need to go in detail. If needed
using also multiple values (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semicolon)
If you read the
2014-07-07 16:50 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
This proposal needs EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES and more EXAMPLES!!!
Hi Andreas,
thanks for the email..
I will try to follow your suggestion :-)
I would like to see some examples that show everything in one picture:
habour, ports, port
2014-07-07 17:09 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-07-05 14:02 GMT+02:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
For port proposal and voting page see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dport
In this case there is hardly a definition, it is hidden
2014-07-07 17:47 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-07-07 17:21 GMT+02:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
As I explained in the talk page previously, I would like to stay with roro
as a value, because it's more common in the usage.
I still believe you should expand
Dear all,
I edited the two proposals as required.
Regarding the intermodal_terminal, I added a definition and some pictures.
Considering the port proposal, I made more extensive changes to make it
more similar to other tags, as suggested by Martin. Mainly the idea is to
have categories in the
2014-07-06 9:48 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com:
On 06/07/2014 08:24, nounours77 wrote:
= So this would imply that port is a individual facility inside a
harbour.
In fact it is the other way round. A port my contain one or more harbours.
(In turn, a harbour may
2014-07-06 12:48 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com:
On 06/07/2014 10:45, sabas88 wrote:
Let me know how I can edit / disambiguate.
The important distinction is that a port is an administrative boundary
(which may have several disjunct areas) whereas harbours
Dear all,
after almost six months from the original proposal, now I would like to ask
you to vote these two new tags.
Accepting the tag landuse=port would improve the detailed tagging of port
areas, for example to tell apart container terminals (easily
distinguishable from satellite imagery) from
If we consider aqueducts
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176520234#map=18/44.45802/8.97848
http://www.acquedottogenova.altervista.org/images/01-primo%20itinerario/46_sifone%20geirato.jpg
http://www.oruko.altervista.org/images/curiosita-ponti/11b-sifone%20geirato.jpg
Otherwise here's a bridge/gas
On 11 May 2014 06:32, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm I've looked up a few other cities (Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Lyon,
Marseille, Rotterdam, Zurich, Manchester, Birmingham, Salzburg,
Aarhus) and they do not have an admin_level tag on the place=* node.
At the same time,
2014-02-27 10:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
@Stephan: I like the coworking_space idea. It certainly fits the practice
at Punspace.
IMO if we have the opportunity we shouldn't use amenity key.
@Stefano: Why do you think we should not use the amenity key?
Because it's
2014-02-27 12:06 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:56 AM, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com wrote:
Because it's overcrowded
Today, it's less than shop ...
and office should suit better, as coworking are
basically and most of the time offices ... :-)
I dont think
2014-02-27 8:45 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de:
On 27.02.2014 01:48, Dave Swarthout wrote:
@Martin, I'm not sure about the status of the books but that's not the
prominent feature of this place. I will go back for more details later
but it is definitely not a library.
2014-02-21 20:43 GMT+01:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Hi
I'm unable to remember the name or find the location of a tag checking web
page.
It was a slippy map of mapnik rendering that had a single line text box
into which you could type a key, value or both after a search would
2014-02-19 17:32 GMT+01:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com:
Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki
page...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
428 instances in taginfo
+1
But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in
2014-02-19 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Btw, use simply depot=* instead of depot:type=*. I don't
understand this recent trend to add a :type suffix in subtags. It
was not the case in the past (e.g. building=*, wood=*,
traffic_signals=*, etc, etc, etc)
Simply because there's
Dear all,
after the discussion regarding the seamark tagging I wanted to start some
proposals to have a consensus on a general way of tagging marine facilities
(and hopefully get them rendered to solve incorrect tagging for the
renderer :-) [1]).
With this proposal I wanted to give a unique tag
2013/11/25 Severin MENARD severin.men...@gmail.com
Hi,
Seems this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coworking does not exist yet.
Here is the taginfo situation
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=working_space#values
What about a office=co_working_space or office=co-working_space?
Hi,
2013/11/3 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2013/11/3 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
Do these kind of shops also exist in other countries, and how are they
referred to? Which of the products that I listed do they sell?
There is surely some overlap between countries,
2013/10/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
Could someone explain the difference between tourism=guest_house and
tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?
Both are suggested here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
but only guest_house is really documented in the wiki.
In taginfo, we
Duration is also important and currently used by OSRM (although not on
relations yet), like http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/176323421
Cheers,
Stefano
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hello,
I would like to start a discussion related to intermodal transport and its
facilities, and I drafted a page[0] with some links in it.
A tagging system should be proposed also considering the maritime tagging
(OpenSeaMap), or extending it to deal with inland facilities.
As an example, I saw
Hello,
I wanted to add information on some restaurants / bars to indicate if they
accept luncheon vouchers (meal vouchers), but I didn't find anything.
These vouchers are given by work employers to be used for lunch payments.
I was looking at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Payment which I
There's also an attraction=water_slide[0], it isn't rendered in the current
stylesheet but it's the correct tag to use :)
I'm respondible for some swimming pools multipolygons, the explaination is
that in water parks there are these big water areas in which you can walk
or swim, but there are
This discussion already took place some months ago..
Since then I saw a lot of changes after I edited initially some Italian
lines..
2012/9/5 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
I opened an issue on OSRM-s Github page:
https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project-OSRM/issues/402
2012/7/2 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc
This is an old proposal that have been discussed before. It seem to be in
use
according to tag watch, so I have been urged to make this official.
There are also similar tags in use and others proposed but that doesn´t
mean
this one could be
Hi,
I saw this [0] page which describes a feature with ~30 uses, created on
June 20th.
Some months ago, I made this[1] proposal for a new shop value, which has
now 80 occurrences.
Should I mark one of the two pages in some way?
What's the correct one?
Regards,
Stefano
Hi,
I started discussing in the local list about the approach in tagging ferry
routes.
The wiki page [0] seems a little bit unclear, leaving two approaches:
-normal way between harbours
-relation like a normal road.
I tried to follow the relation approach like I saw in other seas, but I
cannot
2012/6/3 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk
[cut]
Dover-Calais does seem to work well, you may get some ideas there.
http://map.project-osrm.org/xR
Thanks, seems similar to how I made the routes in Genoa, we'll see at the
next OSRM update how it behaves...
I don't understand why way
Hi all,
I made a proposal for a new soccer=* tag to describe which variant is
played on a field. Currently there isn't a way to tell if a soccer field is
regular-sized (on which it's played the regular soccer) or it's a simple
field traced in a church backyard for example.
2012/5/26 Shu Higashi s_hig...@mua.biglobe.ne.jp
Hi,
I was asked by a woman if she can map the count of urinals (or
something other appropriate name in english?) in a toilet.
Because it is very important for women to count their waiting time.
So I'd like to propose a tag to count the
2012/5/23 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2012/5/23 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
What about building a proposal to extend landcover=* tag to meet FAO's
system?
I think if you wanted to implement the FAO system you would need more
than one additional tag, so I suggest to make up
2012/4/10 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
I am coming back to a topic we had some time ago: sidewalks.
According to this page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
sidewalks should be tagged with
highway=footway
footway=sidewalk
While I agree that for
Il giorno 10/mar/2012 06:49, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us ha
scritto:
To me fitness centers are more related to health than leisure.
I'd prefer to use the tag amenity instead.
Thoughts?
I feel like I'm in prison when I go to the gym[0]…
Clifford
Stefano
[0]
2012/2/21 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
I don't think that a tagging style that works best in Europe will
automatically also be the one that works best in South America. Any attempt
to force everyone to use the same style will automatically make the map
*less* good in some places. I
2012/2/20 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
On the German ML we are currently discussing how to applicate ele to
towers (and similar situations). There is consensus that the key
height is describing the height of the structure from the ground to
the top. There is also consensus to
That's some kind of consideration, like the one I proposed some time ago,
about building a clean tagging scheme, but has led to a discussion about
another topic and died.
My +1 will always go to cleaning.
Cheers,
Stefano
___
Tagging mailing list
2012/1/30 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
It is quite frequent that the names of the more famous places get
translated into different languages. I don't speak Vietnamese, but
this looks like nothing particularily strange to me. If you need a
reason to keep it: I guess the Vietnamese
2012/1/30 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com
I guess you can't, at least not now. That's one issue with the
free-form tagging system we use. Sooner or later we'll have to develop
a process to deprecate tags, change tags, etc. Perhaps we should start
a separate thread and discuss how this process
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2012/1/11 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
I find it a bit harsh that you complain about amenity=dentist when others
languish in an amenity=prison.
I laughed hard, I didn't noticed it :D
2012/1/11 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
nobody stops you from using other keys then
2012/1/11 Michael Krämer ohr...@googlemail.com
To be honest I haven't really thought about the
difference between until this thread came up...
That's a problem for various non-native speakers (me included eheh)
This should be an opportunity to make some changes in syntax and semantics
[1] of
2012/1/11 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
I tag all parking spaces as amenity=parking, even though you have to
rent a place by the month. I'm guessing this is wrong? But this is how
most people do it.
I'd like a subkey for the landuse=road :P
___
Hi list,
I want to suggest a topic of discussion not often considered: planning a
more rational tagging system to be applied onto the existing data and for
the future.
(OK, it's flame time! :D)
For instance the discussion could start with a simple case: healthcare.
Now the health facilities are
2011/12/1 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
while out mapping today, i encountered a barrier type that doesn't have a
suitable
tag in the wiki:
barrier=guardrail
in the specific case, a road leading to an abandoned bridge has had a
guardrail
barrier placed across the road to keep
Hi there,
I made a proposal for a cash and carry shop tag.
Cash and carry are big wholesale dealers (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash_and_carry_%28wholesale%29)
You can find the proposal page here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop%3Dcash_and_carry
Stefano
sarchittuorg
51 matches
Mail list logo
