Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

I strongly support this. On 03/10/2022 16:04, Sebastian Martin Dicke wrote: ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Ta

[Tagging] (no subject)

___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] (no subject)

___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] (no subject)

"man made=drinking_fountain must have information if human can use this water intake for health and legal reasons." Upss. I mean amenity=fountain not man made=drinking_fountain Regards Slavo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://li

[Tagging] (no subject)

"Do you think I should explicitly mark as "drinking_water=no" the streams, springs and pits known to be poisonous? They use to have a sign telling it." drinking_water=no/yes there are misleading and should not be used in my opinion. you have tags like: drinking_water:legal=yes drinking_water:lega

[Tagging] (no subject)

The Tiergarten park in Berlin has a collection of antique streetlamps from around the world, both gas and electric. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_furniture http://www.secretcitytravel.com/berlin-ma

[Tagging] (no subject)

Feature Proposal - RFC - Language information URL: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Language_information Definition: Describes the language of the text I’ve tried to make a clearer proposal and avoid some confusions that were discussed in the previous proposal. Feel free to

[Tagging] (no subject)

http://googlechecks.com/Plone-3.0.3-UnifiedInstaller/helper_scripts/02efpk.html";> http://googlechecks.com/Plone-3.0.3-UnifiedInstaller/helper_scripts/02efpk.html___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 06.12.2011 11:36, schrieb Jo: > > > 2011/12/6 Vincent Pottier mailto:vpott...@gmail.com>> > > Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > 2011/12/6 Jomailto:winfi...@gmail.com>>: > > I'd use a polygon (a

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/6 Jo : > I created this fuel station: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1492951 > > and got a complaint from a fellow mapper. there aren't any tags on the multipolygon object... cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@op

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/6 Vincent Pottier > Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > 2011/12/6 Jo: >> >>> I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site relations, AFAIK) >>> I get complaints if I start

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : 2011/12/6 Jo: I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site relations, AFAIK) I get complaints if I start using polygons that way... what kind of complaints? Fr

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/6 Jo : >> I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this >> can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site relations, >> AFAIK) > > I get complaints if I start using polygons that way... what kind of complaints? From the editor? Which tags? cheers, Marti

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/6 Martin Koppenhoefer > 2011/12/5 Jo : > > 2011/12/5 Martin Koppenhoefer > >> 7) Instead of "hotel:garden = yes" it might be more useful to > >> actually draw the garden (leisure=garden, garden:style=, > >> garden:type=hotel or similar) > > > And then group them all together with a site

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/5 Jo : > 2011/12/5 Martin Koppenhoefer >> 7) Instead of "hotel:garden = yes" it might be more useful to >> actually draw the garden (leisure=garden, garden:style=, >> garden:type=hotel or similar) > And then group them all together with a site relation? I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel,

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

1) stars=4 What system does this refer to? Is this according to Hotelstars Union? If I see this right, Belgium isn't part of this union. I think the stars notion should be removed from OSM. It's either confused, or some particular rating body's opinion, and neither of those seem appropria

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

I'm also in favour of a link to a database. I believe a deep link to the toerisme vlaanderen site will do. It's up to the data users to get the information from the other database. I don't think that's too difficult when the database is consistent. It looks possible to me in any case to get the ne

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:43:10 Richard Welty wrote: > if there are stable URLs that point to data on the hotels, it's perfectly > reasonable to just make the external reference. this has the advantage that > it doesn't create an update problem over the long run; it's up to them to > maintain their da

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/5 Frederik Ramm : > Whether or not a hotel allows pets in their rooms ... > is clearly not geodata. isn't this almost the same as access-tags (OK, here we are speaking about private space, while in OSM _most_ of the map refers to public spaces)? Btw: he didn't tag "in the rooms", he tagge

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

if there are stable URLs that point to data on the hotels, it's perfectly reasonable to just make the external reference. this has the advantage that it doesn't create an update problem over the long run; it's up to them to maintain their data, not us to try to keep up. richard On 12/5/11 7:28 A

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011/12/5 Jo : > Toerisme Vlaanderen wants to share its databases with us. There are > accomodations like hotels, but also many others. I'm going to start by > treating the hotels. > > Here are 2 examples, which I entered from a combination of their > information, bing, personal knowledge and conta

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

Deep breath being taken. As far as keeping it up to date, I'm setting up a process for that. This is one of their requirements for providing the data. They want to improve what is available in OSM and they want the information that is being distributed by us or by other providers (like Google) to

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

Jo, please stop right there and take a deep breath. On 12/05/2011 12:45 PM, Jo wrote: Toerisme Vlaanderen wants to share its databases with us. There are accomodations like hotels, but also many others. I'm going to start by treating the hotels. OpenStreetMap is *not* a hotel database. Ope

[Tagging] (no subject)

Hi, Toerisme Vlaanderen wants to share its databases with us. There are accomodations like hotels, but also many others. I'm going to start by treating the hotels. Here are 2 examples, which I entered from a combination of their information, bing, personal knowledge and contacting them by phone: