On 12/03/2015 10:04 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com
mailto:ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:57:28AM +1100, Warin wrote:
Mapping a maze path would reduce the enjoyment of the maze .. at
least for
+1 to make a wiki entry on leisure=maze. Fits with what already exists and
the alternative isn't really better.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:58 AM Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/03/2015 10:04 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:57:28AM +1100, Warin wrote:
Mapping a maze path would reduce the enjoyment of the maze .. at least
for
me. Even if it was a single path.
spoiler_warning=yes ?
I do not think that is
2015-02-27 1:14 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
So
leisure=maze
Possible sub tags?
material=
fee=
operator=
opening_hours=
etc.
+1 for mazes that fall into the leisure category, and obviously -1 for
those that clearly don't, like the one at the outer facade of the cathedral
of
On 21/02/2015 1:16 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Given that both the multiple-path and single-path definitions are in
use, the OSM definition of labyrinth should not exclude either one.
Present definition of maze within OSM includes labyrinth.
On 20/02/2015 6:57 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 00:04, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
leisure=maze 77
attraction=maze 147
So the usage is split about even..
Looks more like 1:2 to me.
The numbers are too small for me to say.
On 19/02/2015 10:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-02-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com
mailto:ricoz@gmail.com:
in addition to that I think any large enough maze should be mapped
with
highway=maze or highway=path, dead end markers and emergency exits.
On 19/02/2015 8:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-02-19 10:20 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com:
The usuall OSM practice is to have one tag xxx=maze and then have
a sub tag to distinguish the type of maze. Why this exception ..
other than
On 19 February 2015 at 00:04, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
leisure=maze 77
attraction=maze 147
So the usage is split about even..
Looks more like 1:2 to me.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing
Given that both the multiple-path and single-path definitions are in use,
the OSM definition of labyrinth should not exclude either one.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that. Dr.
The maze/labyrinth distinction is there. When I hear of modern labyrinths,
it's usually in the context of religious/spiritual uses (since there's only
one way, it lends itself to a walking meditation). Mazes are generally like
a recreational puzzle, where you're trying to find your way. Whether
Various new age spiritual communities have a strong definition of
labyrinth: it's one path, no dead ends, leading to a center.
There are dozens in my area. The term is widespread and common, as is the
feature.
The one path labyrinth is a mappable feature in OSM, even if Merriam
Webster has not
Labyrinths aren't usually defined as having only one way through them. They
normally have side passages, although, like other mazes, there may be only
one path that will succeed in taking you all of the way to the exit.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:24 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
wrote:
Labyrinths aren't usually defined as having only one way through them.
They normally have side passages, although, like other mazes, there may be
only one path that will succeed in taking you all of the way to the
Here is the definition from my Merriam'Webster dictionary:
1 a : a place constructed of or full of intricate passageways and blind alleys
b : a maze (as in a garden) formed by paths separated by high hedges
2 : something extremely complex or tortuous in structure, arrangement, or
character :
On 19/02/2015 7:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there are also few amenity=maze and historic and tourism.
The key attraction is used according to the wiki for features on a playground
or in a theme park.
Given the huge variety of maze types (ranging from built ones in masonry, ones
made of
On 19/02/2015 8:15 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The problem with
tourism=attraction
attraction=maze
Is that attraction is a top level tag, not a subtag of tourism=attraction.
So maybe:
tourism=attraction
type=maze
subtypes=labyrinth;hedge
I'd do
tourism=maze ... similar to zoo, theme park,
I think that attraction=maze is better than attraction:type (shorter,
without colon, type is not
really adding anything useful, clear detailing of tourism=attraction).
2015-02-19 3:59 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction.
there are also few amenity=maze and historic and tourism.
The key attraction is used according to the wiki for features on a playground
or in a theme park.
Given the huge variety of maze types (ranging from built ones in masonry, ones
made of vegetation to those ornaments carved into historic
The problem with
tourism=attraction
attraction=maze
Is that attraction is a top level tag, not a subtag of tourism=attraction.
So maybe:
tourism=attraction
type=maze
subtypes=labyrinth;hedge
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Yes Mateusz, +1 from me, sounds good -
Dan
2015-02-19 8:00 GMT+00:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
I think that attraction=maze is better than attraction:type (shorter,
without colon, type is not
really adding anything useful, clear detailing of tourism=attraction).
2015-02-19 3:59
There are some super famous ones in Japan in hat appear in the same field every
year - I imagine there is some seasonal tag system to tag when it appears.
There is also a yearly field used for making a giant pice of art. I wonder if
artwork + a time or seasonal tag would work, as it appears
I think it should be k kept under attraction, because a large mappable maze is
certainly an interest of tourists - especially if it is part of a larger
complex.
Then it would be
tourism=attraction
attraction=maze
maze=hedge
or attraction:maze=hedge instead of attraction=maze + maze=hedge
Some forms of mazes and labyrinths
1.
- part of or entire garden (often of a castle or stately home or similarly
representative building), like this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze#mediaviewer/File:Longleat_maze.jpg
or this one:
2015-02-19 10:27 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
I'd do
tourism=maze ... similar to zoo, theme park, museum, artwork.
and if necessary sub tag under that .. there are lots of different types
.. see wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze
I agree. It's simple and to the point.
2015-02-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
in addition to that I think any large enough maze should be mapped with
highway=maze or highway=path, dead end markers and emergency exits.
+1
and telephone number and capacity.
Cheers,
Martin
2015-02-19 10:20 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
The usuall OSM practice is to have one tag xxx=maze and then have a sub
tag to distinguish the type of maze. Why this exception .. other than poor
practice in the past?
you seem to imply that there is just one way to look at the
maze=maize
Probably too temporary for osm but they do appear every summer in the same
area, moving with crop rotation.
The farmer cuts paths through the maize and places a raised platform in the
middle
Phil (trigpoint )
On Thu Feb 19 09:48:33 2015 GMT, johnw wrote:
I think it should be k
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:48:33PM +0900, johnw wrote:
I think it should be k kept under attraction, because a large mappable maze
is certainly an interest of tourists - especially if it is part of a larger
complex.
Then it would be
tourism=attraction
attraction=maze
maze=hedge
On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction. Thus how about:
tourism=attraction
attraction:type=maze
name=Happy Tunnel Kiddie Maze
website=http://maze.example.org/ http://maze.example.org/
What
Seeing as a maze is not an attraction for me, I would prefer the first
option.
Moreover, I would have assumed attraction was a subkey of
tourism=attraction but apparently it is not. There are many uses of the
term but the tag attraction=* was proposed in 2008 but never voted on or
accepted.
The value maze is used some 224 times ... but it is split between
leisure=maze 77
attraction=maze 147
So the usage is split about even..
What would be preferred? Both are applicable... none are documented ..
and I'd like to document one .. so the question which is best?
On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:37 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
Seeing as a maze is not an attraction for me, I would prefer the first
option.
Moreover, I would have assumed attraction was a subkey of tourism=attraction
but apparently it is not. There are many uses of
If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction. Thus how
about:
*tourism=attraction*
*attraction:type=maze*
*name=Happy Tunnel Kiddie Maze*
*website=http://maze.example.org/ http://maze.example.org/*
You want all those similar features (maze/tube hill/ride/garden/water
34 matches
Mail list logo
