Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Underground / hovering buildings

2011-02-15 Thread David Murn
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 01:52 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II : > >> -1, > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer > > our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for > every opinion ;-) Thats

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Underground / hovering buildings

2011-02-15 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 2/15/2011 7:52 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II: -1, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for every opinion ;-) I don't have a big problem with lay

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Underground / hovering buildings

2011-02-15 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II : >> -1, >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for every opinion ;-) I don't have a big problem with layer=0 being considered "ground level", but bef