On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 21:51, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
The Vienna allotments don’t seem to fit our wiki definition, but I think
> they may have started out as allotment gardens years ago and evolved into
> residential areas over time?
>
Back when I mapped some allotments, about a year ago, I came
Many “allotments” in Central Europe have small cabins or even full-sized
houses which are used as part-time residences. Take a look at the
“allotments” around Vienna, Austria for example, or most any German city.
The Vienna allotments don’t seem to fit our wiki definition, but I think
they may
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 14:57, Sérgio V. wrote:
> Hi, BTW, What is actually the difference between:
>
> Tag:place=plot
> (Status: in use / wiki-start: 7 April 2015)
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot
> "Use the tag place=plot to identify a named plot is a tract or parcel of
>
Hi, BTW, What is actually the difference between:
Tag:place=plot
(Status: in use / wiki-start: 7 April 2015)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot
"Use the tag place=plot to identify a named plot is a tract or parcel of land
owned or meant to be owned by some owner."
I believe many areas of allotments have a single postal address assigned to
the entire area, while the individual plots are not registered as official
addresses.
Perhaps this explains why a different tag was used.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:41 PM Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Monday 07 January
On Monday 07 January 2019, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> They are verifiable by asking the organization in charge of the
> allotments, as I initially did
> when mapping some allotments.
Verifiability in OSM means *independent* verifiability based on
observations of the geographic reality. Same as with
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 12:47, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> I am wondering about the practical verifiability of such numbers. I
> mean in OSM we do not map internal numbering systems of organizations
> for their infrastructure if those are not manifested in the form of
> signs visible to the
On Monday 07 January 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> The current wiki page for landuse=allotments
> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) states
> that one should "Use allotments=plot and/or boundary=lot for an
> individual plot and lot=number_of_plot for number of plot."
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 06:45, Anton Klim wrote:
> I think iD might be rendering refs now, unless I misremember.
>
I just checked, and iD doesn't display the ref, only the name. But it no
longer needs
an explicit area=yes to get the label in the centre of the plot rather than
putting it along
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 00:38, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> “One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my breath.”
>
> I’m working on the SQL query right now... but I thought we should discuss
> this here first.
>
Excellent news. Thanks for this.
Point of discussion: should ref=* be
“One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my breath.”
I’m working on the SQL query right now... but I thought we should discuss
this here first.
Re: name=* for plots: I didn’t expect an individual plot to have a name.
But if this is possible it should be documented on the wiki
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:46, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> The current wiki page for landuse=allotments
> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) states
> that one should "Use allotments=plot and/or boundary=lot for an
> individual plot and lot=number_of_plot for number of
The current wiki page for landuse=allotments
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) states
that one should "Use allotments=plot and/or boundary=lot for an
individual plot and lot=number_of_plot for number of plot."
However, the wiki page for allotments=plot
13 matches
Mail list logo
