On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>>> The key landmark might be a possibility, for example, landmark=archway?
>> Prefer to have it in some other name space as not all might be
>> significant landmarks. Additional landmark=yes or landmark=archway might
>> be ok
> +1, I ha
> Il giorno 31/ago/2014, alle ore 16:56, fly ha
> scritto:
>
> See also barrier=sally_port [1]
I am not sure if I understood you right here, but to me this arch is neither a
barrier nor a Sally port.
>
>> The key landmark might be a possibility, for example, landmark=archway?
>
> Prefe
Am 30.08.2014 10:48, schrieb Dave Swarthout:
> That is an excellent question. This arch is quite large but there are
> many other similar structures in villages all over Thailand. I have seen
> many of them but have never tagged any. There is a barrier=archway used
> twice in Taginfo but the ones I
That is an excellent question. This arch is quite large but there are many
other similar structures in villages all over Thailand. I have seen many of
them but have never tagged any. There is a barrier=archway used twice in
Taginfo but the ones I've seen are not barriers in the usual sense of that
Hi,
In this photo http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/idFfQ3kADwqnRL25JEF78g
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/j_Uwf2UAiHjKi_ovtcu_LQ there's a
landmark up ahead at the entrance to the housing project that resembles
an arch. It's quite a prominent landmark in an area which is otherwise
devoid of any dis
