Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-08-04 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 31.07.19 09:34, Warin wrote: > There is no present default unit for power - see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units#Default_units > Adding a default would be good Why would it be good to add a default value? I believe explicit units are generally preferable because they

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-31 Thread Warin
On 31/07/19 20:28, Paul Allen wrote: On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 08:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Err the wiki could state the default is kW. There is no present default unit for power - see

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-31 Thread Paul Allen
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 08:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Err the wiki could state the default is kW. > There is no present default unit for power - see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units#Default_units > Adding a default would be good, and kW is probably the

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-31 Thread Warin
On 31/07/19 01:39, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: The tag socket::output has been used 5000 times, so I think it's best to describe existing usage on the wiki. The current usage is to tag the units, which are almost always kW: socket:type2:output has been used 3663 times, and the majority (>70%) are

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-30 Thread brad
On 7/30/19 2:59 AM, Warin wrote: On 30/07/19 12:38, brad wrote: I don't have an opinion about kw or w, but if the value is only a number, then to prevent confusion and reduce mistagging the key should specify, output-kw=22 . OSM typically places unit after the value. For examples see

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-30 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
The tag socket::output has been used 5000 times, so I think it's best to describe existing usage on the wiki. The current usage is to tag the units, which are almost always kW: socket:type2:output has been used 3663 times, and the majority (>70%) are tagged with 22kW, 22 kW, 43kW and 11 kW - they

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-30 Thread dktue
OSM typically places unit after the value. For examples see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units#Explicit_specifications In Some cases the unit is omitted and a default is assumed. Would this default be "kW" in this case? ___

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-30 Thread Warin
On 30/07/19 12:38, brad wrote: I don't have an opinion about kw or w, but if the value is only a number, then to prevent confusion and reduce mistagging the key should specify, output-kw=22 . OSM typically places unit after the value. For examples see

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-30 Thread Lionel Giard
All electric charging station that i have ever encounter are in "kW" not in watt (ex: 3 kW, 50 kW, 120 kW, 175 kW...). To me, it is the same as the maxspeed tag, we don't put it in m/h but in km/h -> we use the common unit as everyone use it. Thus we don't use the SI value everywhere and that seem

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-29 Thread brad
I don't have an opinion about kw or w, but if the value is only a number, then to prevent confusion and reduce mistagging the key should specify, output-kw=22 . On 7/29/19 5:00 AM, dktue wrote: I'd vote for kW aswell (and a value of "22" then), since we're not always using SI and not always

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-29 Thread Warin
The use of 'multipliers' is common .. As well as kilometers per hour (100 kmh would be come 100,000 mh without the multiplier) there is mass kg and tonnes .. (10kg would be come 10,000 g with the multiplier) , elevation in meters and kilometers etc. Preference should be for what is commonly

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-29 Thread dktue
I'd vote for kW aswell (and a value of "22" then), since we're not always using SI and not always base-unit-values (see kilometers per hour). Am 29.07.2019 um 12:53 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: Am Mo., 29. Juli 2019 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb dktue >: Hello,

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mo., 29. Juli 2019 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb dktue : > Hello, > > the OSM-Wiki-page on charging stations [1] defines the tag > socket::output=watt > > wheres the examples contain values like "22 kW". > > What would the preferred format be? "22000" or "22 kW"? I would like to > clearify this on the

[Tagging] Charging stations: socket::output -- which format for the value?

2019-07-29 Thread dktue
Hello, the OSM-Wiki-page on charging stations [1] defines the tag socket::output=watt wheres the examples contain values like "22 kW". What would the preferred format be? "22000" or "22 kW"? I would like to clearify this on the wiki-page. Personally I would prefer "22000" as it fits with