Hi!
Daniel, from Spain.
Thank you very much for your comments. I didn't know much about "dehesas"
and I'm learning by reading your comments on this mailing list and on the
wiki [1]. (I also didn't know the tag "landuse=meadow_orchard".
Interesting!)
A "dehesa" is not a "landuse=farmland". Nor
On 4/9/19 12:48 am, Diego Cruz wrote:
Does anybody know about other areas in the world where there is an
extensive mixed use of territory?
Way: Woomera Prohibited Area - Defence Infrequent Zone (544274312)
Some of this area is also 'used' for cattle grazing... by farmers. The
farms
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:49, Diego Cruz wrote:
>
> I don't know the existence of this type of mixed usage of land in other
> parts of the world, but I don't mind dropping the Spanish name in favour of
> a universal concept, such as landuse=agrosylvopastoral (which would be the
> most accurate so
Am Di., 3. Sept. 2019 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Diego Cruz :
> How about landuse=mixed_rural? Would that be useful to areas you know
> about?
>
no, it would not allow to tell anything and would be completely unclear.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing
Hi again,
How about landuse=mixed_rural? Would that be useful to areas you know about?
Best regards
Diego
El mar., 3 sept. 2019 a las 16:48, Diego Cruz ()
escribió:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Thank you for your replies!
>
> I'm not so happy about the idea of having three different landuse tags
> that
Hi everybody,
Thank you for your replies!
I'm not so happy about the idea of having three different landuse tags that
in most cases will be rendered incorrectly. Besides, how can you know what
is the main use and what is the secondary one? The thing is that this is a
mixed system, and in Spain
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> I would not renounce from having dehesa somewhere in the value, if this is
> an „English“ term and exactly what you want to tag.
>
It's not a term this Englishman has heard of. But there are a lot of
specialist terms I've
learned
many years ago we were discussing meadow_orchard actually. I agree with
Christoph that there is room for a secondary landuse tag like landuse:secondary
it could otherwise be a subtag for forests, like
landuse=forest
forest=dehesa
or forest=agroforestry
agroforestry=dehesa
I would not renounce
Re: "As for establishing two different landuse tags for the same
territory, it could be fine for me, but I don't know if that would
create rendering problems"
It's not so much of a problem; renders could choose to just show the
primary feature, or they could choose to interpret both tags. Since
Hi Peter,
A dehesa is not just a type of farmland, because the surface is covered by
trees that are regularly pruned and used for wood, so it is a mixed usage
of farmland and forestry (and pasture).
Best regards
Diego
El sáb., 31 ago. 2019 a las 12:47, Peter Elderson ()
escribió:
> It appears
It appears to be a specific type of farmland, so landuse=farmland +
farmland=dehesa would say it all and disrupt nothing.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 31 aug. 2019 om 12:25 heeft Diego Cruz het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Hi Cristoph,
>
> Thank you for your feedback, it's really appreciated. You
Hi Cristoph,
Thank you for your feedback, it's really appreciated. You are completely
right when you say that dehesa might exclude similar environments in other
parts of the world, and that is of course not my intention. I just used the
word dehesa because it appears as such in Wikipedia. Among
On Friday 30 August 2019, Diego Cruz wrote:
>
> I have recently proposed a new tag in the Wiki, because none of the
> existing landuse tags seem to match it. A dehesa is a type of land
> that combines a forest with either fields or pasturelands (or both)
> at the same time. It is extensively used
Hi everyone,
This is the first time I use this mailing list, so please excuse me if I'm
accidentally ignoring any step in the proceedings.
I have recently proposed a new tag in the Wiki, because none of the
existing landuse tags seem to match it. A dehesa is a type of land that
combines a forest
14 matches
Mail list logo
