[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

Following on from https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-November/056482.html, I've put together a proposal to make some changes & additions under the Emergency key. Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations & have a look. All comments welcome either here or

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations & have a > look. > Thinking about this further, I'm thinking that Rescue Services may be better than Rescue Stations? I've also realised that Stations / Services is only a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations & have a > look. > Reminder that voting is close to opening on this proposal. *Precis:* Amend the heading emergency=other_stations to emergency=rescue_stations / rescue_ser

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

Looks good to me. Personally I'd usually try to add the operator and operator:wikidata tags in combination to give more context. On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 13:47, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick > wrote: > >> Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 14:51, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > Personally I'd usually try to add the operator and operator:wikidata tags > in combination to give more context. > Thanks - I never think of wikidata tags as I don't usually use them. Added Graeme __

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations > Moved to voting. If you still have any comments or concerns, please raise them for discussion, rather than just voting "No, because ..."! Thanks Graeme __

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

The text of the proposal is still confusing. Is the tag emergency=rescue_stations being proposed? What are the tags which are proposed and what will be the definition of each tag? — Joseph Eisenberg On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 7:33 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 13:50, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > The text of the proposal is still confusing. > Sorry about that - maybe it should have been broken into 2 separate things? Is the tag emergency=rescue_stations being proposed? > Currently the Emergency page has the heading "Other Stations

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

How objects tagged now with amenity=lifeboat_station should be tagged after this proposal passes? It deprecates some tags without info about proposed replacements about any of them, and some are actually used. Also "The area of the Rescue base should render with the same pink colour as curren

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

sent from a phone > On 20. Dec 2020, at 05:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > The existing emergency=disaster_response will get a better definition to > cover each countries Emergency Rescue / Civil Defence service/s which kind of places should get the tag? Garages and places where equipment

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 17:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > How objects tagged now with amenity=lifeboat_station should be tagged > after this proposal passes? > They were a late addition after somebody pointed out that they exist. They would be replaced by

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 19:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 20. Dec 2020, at 05:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick > wrote: > > The existing emergency > =disaster_response > > will

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

> Yes, but all proposals suggest a rendering scheme. > The proposal process wiki page says "Not a part of the proposals process as such, but hints for the renderer maintainer will help them out. maybe a description of an icon (refer Map Icons), or an example mock-up. Usually may be safely omitted

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

Per the Proposal Process at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process#Voting it's normal to send a new email with the subject like "Feature Proposal - Voting - (Feature Name)" to the list. Many people might not be reading every email in the RFC thread, but do want to know when voting is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

Thanks Andrew! Done! Graeme On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 10:21, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Per the Proposal Process at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process#Voting it's normal > to send a new email with the subject like "Feature Proposal - Voting - > (Feature Name)" to the list. > > Ma

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

Dec 20, 2020, 23:29 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 17:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> >> How objects tagged now with amenity=lifeboat_station should be tagged after >> this proposal passes? >> > > They were a late addition after

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:15, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Dec 22, 2020, 00:42 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > > > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 23:24, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > Dec 20, 2020, 23:29 by graemefi...@gma

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency=Rescue Stations

sent from a phone > On 22. Dec 2020, at 09:42, Andrew Harvey wrote: > I think it's fine to use marine here, even though it may not strictly be at > sea and could be related to inland waters. So long as this is clearly stated > in the wiki documentation. It's not always possible to have OSM ta