Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-14 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 2017-10-14 um 06:49 schrieb Jo: > Maybe > > recheck_itinerary_route_by > > would be a better tag. Then it can also be used when route relations are > changed for roadworks that take more than say, a month and that cause > changes in itinerary. If recheck_itinerary_route_by= reduces the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-14 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 2017-10-14 um 00:29 schrieb Jo: > 2017-10-13 23:59 GMT+02:00 Andrew Davidson : > We don't have a scheme to tag the timetables and it would be quite hard to > come up with one, involving many relations we don't want to maintain. > Better to leave that part to GTFS. > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-14 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Warin, Am 2017-10-13 um 23:22 schrieb Warin: > On 14-Oct-17 04:11 AM, Michael Reichert wrote: >> end_date=* is used on disused objects or objects whose last day of >> operation/service is known. Common examples are disused railway tracks >> or shops which announced the last day they will be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Jo
Maybe recheck_itinerary_route_by would be a better tag. Then it can also be used when route relations are changed for roadworks that take more than say, a month and that cause changes in itinerary. Polyglot 2017-10-14 2:00 GMT+02:00 Andrew Davidson : > > > On 14/10/17

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Andrew Davidson
On 14/10/17 09:29, Jo wrote: So the proposal is about the routes/itineraries that change, stops that aren't served anymore or new stops added to the lines. Are you sure about that? The proposed new tag is "timetable:valid_until". And the explanation starts of with: "every year

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Andrew Davidson
On 14 Oct. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally I don't enter timetable data, not something I expect the map to deal with. . This was something I wanted to clarify. Are we discussing changing routes (ie: the stops and the order they are served in) or changing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Warin
On 14-Oct-17 04:11 AM, Michael Reichert wrote: Hi Andrew, Am 12.10.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Andrew Davidson: Do you want data users to consume this tag? Or is intended for other mappers to know when something needs to be updated? It is their decision what they consume and what not. The primary

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Erkin Alp Güney
They may open any time. It is sometimes associated with political events. However, closures almost always happen on the start of the timetable period. Michael wrote: > Unfortunately, sometimes timetables or operators change not only in > December but also in June. New (railway) lines or stations

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-12 Thread Warin
Possibly an application for end_date ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:end_date On 13-Oct-17 07:45 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote: Do you want data users to consume this tag? Or is intended for other mappers to know when something needs to be updated? There does appear to be a strong push