Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

On 15/09/19 01:59, Ruben wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:59:29 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: 'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number that I don't recall of the top of my head. I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:59:29 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > 'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number > that I don't recall of the top of my head. > > I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an > individual response in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

Am 10.09.2019 um 10:00 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > sent from a phone > > On 8. Sep 2019, at 22:11, Simon Poole > wrote: > >> Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any >> application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

I would use the "phone" key rather than mixing phone numbers in the opening hours value. If there are several phone numbers and one is dedicated for making appointments, it could be a phone subtag like phone:appointments=### Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

The key 'opening_hours' has a free from text entry facility. I have used this where a museum is open by appointment only thus 'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number that I don't recall of the top of my head. I think this is more versatile than yet another

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

sent from a phone > On 8. Sep 2019, at 22:11, Simon Poole wrote: > > Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any > application would have to equate this to "you have to inquire if it is > open")? it may be the same for apps, it isn’t for mappers, “unknown” is an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 01:12, Ruben wrote: > Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" > and "off": > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax Not a bad idea at all, Ruben. On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 06:13,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is open")? Am 08.09.2019 um 17:10 schrieb Ruben: > Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" > and "off": > >

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" and "off": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax Kind regards Ruben ___ Tagging mailing list