[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - image=http://example.com/image_license_page

2013-07-02 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
After modifications based on comments, and discussion with stakeholders, this proposal is now open again for vote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image This tag has over 12,000 uses, and I feel it is time to define the expectations for the tag clearly. The big change is a def

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - image=http://example.com/image_license_page

2013-07-02 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 02.07.2013 17:56, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image > This tag has over 12,000 uses, and I feel it is time to define the > expectations for the tag clearly. Unfortunately, some crucial expectations that I have for linked images are still missing:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - image=http://example.com/image_license_page

2013-07-02 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > * I feel that it should be stated that *only* images under a free > license should be linked, i.e. images that offer the same freedoms as > OpenStreetMap data. > The license of both images and the OSM database may evolve or change from time t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - image=http://example.com/image_license_page

2013-07-03 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 02.07.2013 19:17, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Tobias Knerr > wrote: > > * I feel that it should be stated that *only* images under a free > license should be linked, i.e. images that offer the same freedoms as > OpenStreetMap

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - image=http://example.com/image_license_page

2013-07-03 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > But that intelligence may not involve an "index page" at all for some > image repositories, as each site works differently. For example, the > historical map supposedly also recognizes declarations in robots.txt. Or > there may be a repository