Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-10-19 Thread John Willis
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 2:50 AM, bkil wrote: > > There are lots of bomb shelters, although nobody knows how to tag > these. Sounds like you found something that needs a proposal! ^___^ Javbw ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-10-19 Thread bkil
In that case, there won't be a lot of assembly points in Hungary, if any. I don't know any private building that has an evacuation plan, but I do know a few office buildings that have one, and usually they are the ones with the non-trivial ones anyway, taking care of thousands of people per

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-10-18 Thread John Willis
Hmm... The active shooter discussion brought up some good things to think about. As far as I know, we are not mapping the evacuation plans of individual buildings with assembly_point. When talking about the schools, we talked about shelters and assembly_points. The pitch at a public

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-10-18 Thread bkil
How do you map the following? Two buildings next to each other have dedicated assembly points on the front yard. However the twist is that the assembly point of the first building is in front of the second building and vice versa. The reason is probably to both increase survival rate by taking

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-23 Thread John Willis
Thanks - I added a small note about the tsunami elevation in the examples. Javbw > On Sep 23, 2018, at 9:14 PM, Daniele Santini wrote: > > Ok, I updated the existing proposal ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-23 Thread Daniele Santini
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose > Message-ID: <39497331-d154-430f-85df-f4713c678...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > On

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-22 Thread John Willis
> On Sep 22, 2018, at 11:03 PM, Daniele Santini wrote: > > edit the proposal substituting the old tag and values with the new tags or > create a new proposal with the new tags? If you feel the original proposal (or the discussion around it) is valuable, start a new one. If it is of minor or

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-22 Thread Daniele Santini
> Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 06:42:30 +0900 > From: John Willis > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose > Message-ID: <688ef169-5441-4a7b-819f-3764eac4c...@m

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-21 Thread Warin
On 22/09/18 07:42, John Willis wrote: On Sep 22, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: Problem: most assembly points are multi-purpose around here. At least fire and earthquake. And they are not marked with a purpose. Very true - I think most people assume an assembly point is "safe",

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-21 Thread John Willis
> On Sep 22, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > Problem: most assembly points are multi-purpose around here. At least fire > and earthquake. And they are not marked with a purpose. Very true - I think most people assume an assembly point is "safe", as the location is chosen

[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

2018-09-21 Thread Daniele Santini
Link of the proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/assembly_point:purpose . Hi, I propose to add the tag key assembly_point:purpose to specify which emergency an emergency=assembly_point is designed for. Possible values would be fire, tzunami, earthquake, tornado, etc.