Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskippednumbers

2009-10-15 Thread Randy Thomson
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: actually I think that instead of discussing interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers you could map explicitly the nodes of the real numbers, thus getting a high-precision map instead of this interpolation-crab, that is much less useful then an actual accurate

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskippednumbers

2009-10-15 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Randy Thomson rwtnospam-...@yahoo.com wrote: Sounds good Martin. I have about 3000-5000 houses to tag, I'll tag the beginning and ending house addresses, on each street, if you'll tag the 15-20 individual houses in between. They're in the satellite images, so

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskippednumbers

2009-10-13 Thread Mike N.
TIGER obfuscates the data by declaring the entire numbering range of a zone: for example a 400 block / Even containing houses 404 through 420 would be declared as range Even / 400-498 in TIGER. For navigation purposes, that gets you to within one block of an address. Maybe they do it for

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskippednumbers

2009-10-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
actually I think that instead of discussing interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers you could map explicitly the nodes of the real numbers, thus getting a high-precision map instead of this interpolation-crab, that is much less useful then an actual accurate position ;-) just my 2 cents.