On Sat, 15 Oct 2022, 20:02 Marc_marc, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 15.10.22 à 18:55, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
> > (
> > It is certainly not something that can be represented
> > by a bicycle route relation.
>
> witch issue did you see ?
>
It's not signposted.
At least parts of it are off-limits for
Oct 15, 2022, 20:00 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> for OpenHisctoricMap or other, why not ?
> so let's "archive" it on OHM before deleting it from osm
>
Archiving it in OHM is completely independent from cleaning
it from OSM.
No longer existing objects can be deleted, and waiting for OHM
Hello,
Le 15.10.22 à 18:55, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
(using Google's English translation of the Danish text)
In addition a bicycle route has to be signposted.
it was signposted when it happend :)
I doubt that the the fact that the TdF in a given year ran over a
certain set of roads is
Volker Schmidt:
(using Google's English translation of the Danish text)
Yes, sorry, I meant to send it to the Danish list.
In addition a bicycle route has to be signposted.
I doubt that the the fact that the TdF in a given year ran over a certain set of
roads is something that is to be
(using Google's English translation of the Danish text)
In addition a bicycle route has to be signposted.
I doubt that the the fact that the TdF in a given year ran over a certain
set of roads is something that is to be inserted in a geographical
database, as is OSM.
It is certainly not
Fx
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13488959/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14315474
Enten skal de slettes.
Eller hvis der er cyklister, der synes at det er sjovt at cykle på historiske ruter,
så skal de ændres så de bruger cykelstier i stedet for vejstykker hvor man ikke må
