Re: [Tagging] Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

Sep 13, 2022, 08:55 by m...@jeroenhoek.nl: > On 12-09-2022 22:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> It seems to be changed on Wiki in >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:tracktype&diff=1627780&oldid=1448864 >> >>

Re: [Tagging] Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

sent from a phone > On 24 Sep 2022, at 20:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > "May be applicable to heavily degraded and crumbled roads which was paved in > past." according to what I imagine by this description it could be grade3 as well, “paved in the past” Cheers Martin __

Re: [Tagging] Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

Please allow me to add that what I'll call grade1 which ISN'T truly paved (or once was), but is essentially surface=compacted, is a distinctly different kind of road when it is wet, muddy or actively raining (at least for such tracks/roads around here). These become pretty slick and even "iffy"

Re: [Tagging] Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

Dear all, stevea wrote Sun Sep 25 2022 00:43:53 GMT+0200 > Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination? while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype does not explicitly exclude it but "only" strongly suggests it by telling "Usually a paved surface (cal

Re: [Tagging] Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

On Sep 25, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Georg wrote: > stevea wrote Sun Sep 25 2022 00:43:53 GMT+0200 > > Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination? > > while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype > does not explicitly exclude it but "only" strongly suggests it b