Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 05:47, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com ha scritto: If everyone locally calls it a desert... then what? Print out pages from wikipedia and start arguing :-)? chances are high that it really will rain very few in this case, although there might be

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 04:49, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com ha scritto: I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as mountains by that definition if approached from one direction but not the other. Mogollon Rim for one:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Friday 13 September 2013, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: If everyone locally calls it a desert... then what? Print out pages from wikipedia and start arguing :-)? This is exactly what i was talking about earlier: Just because there are areas which undisputedly qualify as deserts does not mean this

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Tod Fitch
On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 04:49, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com ha scritto: I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as mountains by that definition if approached from one direction but not the

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-12 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: Is there an equivalent body of thought into how to apply defaults to huge geographic areas? Two things here. There is already a proposal to put defaults on multipolygons:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-12 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
What's a mountain what's a desert? Depends where you are. A typical color landform map sets defined elevation boundaries for each color on the map. But human practice is that the boundaries are relative. What's a mountain in the East would be a foothill in the Sierra. Perhaps what the OSM

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-12 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/12 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com What's a mountain what's a desert? Depends where you are. well, wikipedia says: Deserts generally receive less than 250 millimetres (10 in) of rain (precipitation) each year.[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert#cite_note-EG-1 Semideserts

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-12 Thread Tod Fitch
Sounds like a definition set by politicians. :) I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as mountains by that definition if approached from one direction but not the other. Mogollon Rim for one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mogollon_Rim -Tod On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:49

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-12 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: well, wikipedia says: Deserts generally receive less than 250 millimetres (10 in) of rain (precipitation) each year.[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert#cite_note-EG-1 Semideserts

[Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-11 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/11 Christoph Hormann chris_horm...@gmx.de there is simply no way with the current OSM data model to properly map deserts. +1, generally we are not well prepared to map huge geographic areas or