Hello list,
There's a proposal in the wiki that money transfer agents such as Western
Union should be tagged as amenity=money_transfer.
I don't like this tag because of the over use of amenity key.
Many of the money transfer agents are banks or bureau de change, which are
amenities.
What do you
Maybe something even wider like:
service:money:transfer=yes
service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some
banks too, not only exchange bureaus)
service:money:withdraw=yes
service:money:deposit_coins=yes
and so on..
Janko
2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel
> Hello list,
>
There's a proposal in the wiki that money transfer agents such as
Western Union should be tagged as amenity=money_transfer.
I don't like this tag because of the over use of amenity key.
+1.
Many of the money transfer agents are banks or bureau de change, which
are amenities.
Yes, in France,
Le 19/11/2012 15:58, Janko Mihelić a écrit :
Maybe something even wider like:
service:money:transfer=yes
service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some
banks too, not only exchange bureaus)
service:money:withdraw=yes
service:money:deposit_coins=yes
I like it.
So servi
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Sébastien Pierrel
wrote:
> What do you think of money_transfer=agent + operator:money_transfer="Western
> Union"?
Do you mean "in combination with an existing amenity=* like =bank" ?
Banks are also offering insurance services, or even mobile phone
subscriptions.
Sounds good -- if there would be a general financial services main tag like
amenity=financial_services (when it's not part of another amenity). Is such
used already?
Btw. I _think_ it should be withdraw_al_ (with the *al ending).
-Jaakko
On Nov 19, 2012 10:02 AM, "Eric SIBERT" wrote:
> There's
2012/11/19 Pieren
> Is it really the aim of a geospatial database ?
>
You can go to the limit with this statement and say that you should only
map addresses, but the fact a bank is on that address is for a different
database.
I think we should have tags for all things, and then see which ones
On 19 November 2012 17:39, Pieren wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Sébastien Pierrel
> wrote:
>
> > What do you think of money_transfer=agent +
> operator:money_transfer="Western
> > Union"?
>
> Do you mean "in combination with an existing amenity=* like =bank" ?
>
yes, exactly.
Money
On 19 November 2012 17:03, Eric SIBERT wrote:
> Le 19/11/2012 15:58, Janko Mihelić a écrit :
>
> Maybe something even wider like:
>>
>> service:money:transfer=yes
>> service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some
>> banks too, not only exchange bureaus)
>> service:money:
2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel :
> What do you think of money_transfer=agent + operator:money_transfer="Western
> Union"?
I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
simple "operator". The tag should refer to the object that is tagged,
and if it is a money transfer it will
On 20 November 2012 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel :
> > What do you think of money_transfer=agent +
> operator:money_transfer="Western
> > Union"?
>
>
> I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
> simple "operator". The tag should refe
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
> simple "operator". The tag should refer to the object that is tagged,
> and if it is a money transfer it will refer to that, also when you
> don't prefix it. I di
Pieren,
... And those are all important things to find.
-Jaakko
On Nov 20, 2012 4:47 AM, "Pieren" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> > I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
> > simple "operator". The tag should refer to the
2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel
>
>
> I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions.
> So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ?
>
> starting to get awkward...
>
What if we put "service:money:transfer=Western_Union"? And whenever you
have that key (service:money:tran
On 20 November 2012 18:05, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel
>>
>>
>> I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions.
>> So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ?
>>
>> starting to get awkward...
>>
>
> What if we put "service:money:transfer=West
2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel
>
> What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and
> Moneygram?
>
service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
On 20 November 2012 18:50, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
>
> 2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel
>
>>
>> What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and
>> Moneygram?
>>
>
> service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram
>
>
I don't like this kind of combo (reason for starting this thread).
17 matches
Mail list logo
