I have revised the proposal per comments received:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I've been using our streetviews (customstreetviews.com) to update OSM,
and would like to throw a few ideas out for consideration.
Street-level photos have a lat/long, but that location is not the
location of the item in the photo. Panoramic images, like ours, have
a lat/long of the camera, but
On 6/23/13 7:21 AM, Tac Tacelosky wrote:
I've been using our streetviews (customstreetviews.com) to update OSM,
and would like to throw a few ideas out for consideration.
Street-level photos have a lat/long, but that location is not the
location of the item in the photo. Panoramic images, like
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Tac Tacelosky tac...@gmail.com wrote:
Has the idea of an image archive for OSM been brought up before? I
know about openstreetview.org, but as far as I can see, it's mostly
geotagged photos, there's not a lot of metadata there, nor integration
explicitly with
My one year old Samsung Galaxy S3 has got the ability to geotag photos. If
there would be an app which can use such a geotagged photo and link it to
an OSM POI nearby, than I would go for that. Upload it under ODbL, no
copyright issues, Cost is a secondary thing which can be solved.
Cheers, Johan
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote:
My one year old Samsung Galaxy S3 has got the ability to geotag photos. If
there would be an app which can use such a geotagged photo and link it to
an OSM POI nearby, than I would go for that. Upload it under ODbL, no
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.comwrote:
While there is considerable interest in historical data attached to OSM
objects, the image tag is not the place to innovate.
Photographs are inherently historical: weather and lighting can (and,
obviously, will)
Am 11.06.2013 23:19, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Here is image=File:Dresden Theaterplatz 138.JPG
wouldn't it be better to have all values tagged according to the same
rules, i.e. use a fully qualified url for the image tag?
discussion,
strategy and related tools tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Photo links in OSM
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 6/12/13 8:24 AM, Jaakko Helleranta.com wrote:
I was actually about to post a comment myself that more than one image _might_
be justified in some casaes -- but having images from different time is
probably not a good idea.
Especially:
image:date=url
would seem not suitable for OSM. Or what
On 6/12/13 3:38 AM, Zecke wrote:
image:date=url dated image, where date format
undergoes the rules described e.g. here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
(only such date
formats without blanks should be used -
Am 12.06.2013 14:36, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm not at all enthusiastic about having a variable value like that
as a key
Well, I understand your concern. I would much prefer a lifecycle
relation or even a data model supporting key-value lists as a valid value.
I also see much resistance to
On 6/12/13 9:28 AM, Zecke wrote:
Am 12.06.2013 14:36, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm not at all enthusiastic about having a variable value like that
as a key
Well, I understand your concern. I would much prefer a lifecycle
relation or even a data model supporting key-value lists as a valid
value.
Is it possible to view geotagged Flickr photos or geotagged photos from
some other reputable image hosting service in JOSM? Flickr, Picasa,
what-not would be good. .. And even better if it was possible to choose to
view only photos of certain license (thinking of different CC licenses).
I thought
How are your photos geotagged? Is it coded in the EXIF data, or is
there separate metadata? And if so, what kind of data do you have?
We have a photo-based tagging project that doesn't use OSM, but I have
some experience in methods for feature extraction, I'd be happy to
share some of our
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Zecke z...@saeuferleber.de wrote:
image:ancient=url ancient image of the object
image:date=url dated image, where date format undergoes
the rules described e.g. here:
FOR YOUR COMMENT PRIOR TO VOTING:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2013/6/12 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
Abandoned objects however are fine:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned
They should be mapped as they are now, and can leave some traces as to
what they were.
to some extent many objects that did not directly leave physical remains
FYI : You may also have a look at the OsmFlickr service
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Flickr
http://demo.3liz.com/osmflickr/
It works the other way around.
2013/6/11 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
I'm interested in revisiting the issue of attaching links to photographs
in OSM via
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:50 AM, René Kirchhoff rene-kirchh...@arcor.dewrote:
Hello,
see TagInfo:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=image
There are not 322. There are 12 162...
Ah, so there are.
If I adpot and re-open for vote
see
http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=18lat=51.05419lon=13.73556layers=BFTTselect=n248573020
This is OSM-Node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/248573020
Here is image=File:Dresden Theaterplatz 138.JPG
This is for the image:
On 6/11/13 4:01 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:50 AM, René Kirchhoff rene-kirchh...@arcor.dewrote:
Hello,
see TagInfo:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=image
There are not 322. There are 12 162...
Ah, so there are.
If I adpot and re-open for vote
Hello,
we also use flickr:
http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=18lon=7.21383lat=50.6656layers=BFTTselect=n259103401
This is Node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/259103401
Here is in image=http://www.flickr.com/photos/osmwolf/8624644661/
And we view
More informations in German about image=*
http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Historische_Objekte#Bildvorschau
see Chapter:
*Wikimedia-Commons-Bild-URL
*and*
*
*flickr-Bild-URL
*
Gruß René*
*
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 6/11/2013 4:18 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i'm not sure that flickr links to jpgs are particularly stable, you may
want to consider that in your documentation of a flickr link. flickr links
these days look like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nfgusedautoparts/8596790653/
and while you can
2013/6/11 René Kirchhoff rene-kirchh...@arcor.de
This is OSM-Node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/248573020
Here is image=File:Dresden Theaterplatz 138.JPG
wouldn't it be better to have all values tagged according to the same
rules, i.e. use a fully qualified url for the image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nfgusedautoparts/8596790653/
and while you can dig up a direct link to a jpg, it looks like this:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8366/8596790653_06bb215baf_k_d.jpg
and i'm just not persuaded that flickr will honor this as a permanent
link.
I can find the direct
On 6/11/13 4:38 PM, René Kirchhoff wrote:
Hello,
we also use flickr:
http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=18lon=7.21383lat=50.6656layers=BFTTselect=n259103401
and that's fine. i was specifically commenting on the proposal that might
be revived, and it clearly
Thanks for bringing up this topic, it's also something I'd like to revive.
In particular, when a new amenity is being added from one of our
panoramic photos from customstreetview.com, I'd like to provide a
reference back to that. For example, here's a fitness center from an
area that has very
I'm interested in revisiting the issue of attaching links to photographs in
OSM via tag.
There's an ancient stale proposal at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image
But no hint of why the proposal was abandoned, or any of the points of
debate.
There seems to be little push
30 matches
Mail list logo
