Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

sent from a phone > On 17. Dec 2019, at 00:28, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I personally have thoroughly rejected overlaying ways. I am also using them rather rarely, and prefer multipolygon relations because they are easier to edit and easier to understand in the editor. Still

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

On 16/12/19 21:58, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 04:39 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com >: I am against overlaying one way on top of another. The wiki suggests both tags together on a single way is acceptable;

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 04:39 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > I am against overlaying one way on top of another. > > The wiki suggests both tags together on a single way is acceptable; > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland#Islands_in_the_sea > > Given the

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

I am against overlaying one way on top of another. The wiki suggests both tags together on a single way is acceptable; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland#Islands_in_the_sea Given the suggested alternatives, I prefer both tags together. On 15/12/19 12:54, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

sent from a phone > On 15. Dec 2019, at 02:11, Paul Allen wrote: > > The inner is entirely within the outer, so it meets the letter of the law > (but maybe not the spirit). > Can renderers cope with it? basically you have just outer members then (one in the simplest case), renderers and

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 00:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Or you could create a multipolygon relation for the island by adding the > coastline as outer way > That's something I hadn't thought of. I just experimented in iD (didn't save the result, it was pure invention) and it seems to work.

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

sent from a phone > On 15. Dec 2019, at 00:15, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There would not be too many coast lines with names, fewer again with a > continuous coasts that have names. > So I would think the name applies to the island, not the coast. you can think it is most

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

sent from a phone > On 15. Dec 2019, at 00:14, Paul Allen wrote: > > You could go with the one object/one way method. Draw an area for the > place=island. On top of > that draw a closed way for the coastline. It's extra work, and a bit > tedious, but not too bad. yes, you could either

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

On 15/12/19 09:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Looking at the individual islands, it is kind of problematic that the linear coastline and the area place=island are not distinguishable: you can’t tell whether that’s the name of the coastline or the island or both, e.g. here

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 22:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Looking at the individual islands, it is kind of problematic that the > linear coastline and the area place=island are not distinguishable: you > can’t tell whether that’s the name of the coastline or the island or both, > e.g. here >

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

sent from a phone >> On 14. Dec 2019, at 12:46, Christoph Hormann wrote: > That looks correct, archipelagos are normal multipolygon relations. +1 > Building them from the same coastline ways that are used to map the > individual islands is the established method for mapping them.

Re: [Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

On Saturday 14 December 2019, Warin wrote: > > I think this is ok. But is there a better way? > > The particular relation is 55737 the Schouten Islands. You mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/557367 That looks correct, archipelagos are normal multipolygon relations. Building them

[Tagging] Relation for place archipelago with members place island

I came across a tagged relation that had no physical tags and concluded that it is collection of islands, an archipelago. So I have tagged them as such. The members are tagged as islands and coastline on the same ways. I think this is ok. But is there a better way? The particular relation is