On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2012/6/8 Anthony :
>> Since when is anyone forced to read the OSM wiki simply to tag some feature?
>
> nobody is forced, but of course everybody is invited...
I was responding to this.
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Martin Vonwald
2012/6/8 Anthony :
> Since when is anyone forced to read the OSM wiki simply to tag some feature?
nobody is forced, but of course everybody is invited...
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/
> Since when is anyone forced to read the OSM wiki simply to tag some feature?
You are really picky today ;-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> I think Martin Koppenhoefer was mostly referring to tag definitions
> that consist solely of a link to wikipedia. This of course doesn't
> make much sense as no-one should be forced to read wikipedia simply to
> tag some feature.
Since when
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> 2012/6/7 Pieren :
>> Do you have an example of such tag definition ? Don't tell me
>> "mini-roundabout" ;-)
>
> Is it? I just reread the article and - despite the fact that a
> wikipedia link is right at the beginng - the complete definition
2012/6/8 Martin Vonwald :
> 2012/6/8 Janko Mihelić :
>> 2012/6/7 Martin Koppenhoefer
>>> My plea is to avoid these links to external ressources and to define
>>> all necessary settings in our own wiki.
>> I think that a deeper integration with wikipedia could be a very interesting
>> thing. Maybe
2012/6/8 Janko Mihelić :
> 2012/6/7 Martin Koppenhoefer
>> My plea is to avoid these links to external ressources and to define
>> all necessary settings in our own wiki.
> I think that a deeper integration with wikipedia could be a very interesting
> thing. Maybe some links on our wiki aren't co
2012/6/7 Pieren :
> Do you have an example of such tag definition ? Don't tell me
> "mini-roundabout" ;-)
Is it? I just reread the article and - despite the fact that a
wikipedia link is right at the beginng - the complete definition of
what we define as a "mini-roundabout" in OSM is there. What i
2012/6/7 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> My plea is to avoid these links to external ressources and to define
> all necessary settings in our own wiki.
>
I think that a deeper integration with wikipedia could be a very
interesting thing. Maybe some links on our wiki aren't correct, but the
possibility
2012/6/7 Pieren :
> Do you have an example of such tag definition ? Don't tell me
> "mini-roundabout" ;-)
I stumble from time to time upon these, the reason for this post was
amenity=marketplace.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marketplace
but this was already in proposal phase linking to wiki
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> My plea is to avoid these links to external ressources and to define
> all necessary settings in our own wiki.
+1
Perhaps keep the link for further information (for what it is, an
external link) but keep at least the main definition in
For some tag definitions in the OSM wiki there are cross links to
wikipedia. I think that this is problematic for at least these
reasons:
1. Wikipedia articles are permanently changed. Does this imply that
also our tag definition changes? This could be fixed by linking to
distinct versions of WP a
12 matches
Mail list logo
