On 2020-01-01 02:04, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 19:16, Colin Smale wrote:What
> do you consider a definition of "duty free" or "duty free shop"
> that would be useful to a OSM data consumer?
> Which OSM data consumer?
>
> Just a reminder: I didn't start this, I am merely
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 19:16, Colin Smale wrote:
>> What do you consider a definition of "duty free" or "duty free shop"
>> that would be useful to a OSM data consumer?
>
> Which OSM data consumer?
>
> Just a reminder: I didn't start this, I am merely trying to add a nuance to
> the data
Hi,
> Which OSM data consumer?
I personally thought of tourists wanting to buy stuff. As you mentioned,
a EU-tourist has no benefit of this duty-free-information, but I also
think of tourists (from) outside the EU.
As a use case: I think of the OsmAnd app filtering for duty-free-shops
where
On 2020-01-01 00:54, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 18:48, Colin Smale wrote:
>
>> Just to be clear: in the situation I am referring to, an article priced at
>> GBP120 in such a mixed shop is GBP120 net to an exporting passenger, but
>> GBP100 net + GBP20 tax (@20% VAT) to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 18:48, Colin Smale wrote:
> Just to be clear: in the situation I am referring to, an article priced at
> GBP120 in such a mixed shop is GBP120 net to an exporting passenger, but
> GBP100 net + GBP20 tax (@20% VAT) to a non-exporting passenger. Everybody
> pays the same,
On 2019-12-31 23:55, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 17:37, Colin Smale wrote: On
> 2019-12-31 23:04, Hauke Stieler wrote: that's true, the EU is one special
> case here. But would the status of a
> traveler influence the tagging schema of "duty_free=*" in your opinion?
> The
Hi,
> In terms of tagging, the scenario described could be something like
> duty_free=export - meaning YES if you are exporting it beyond the
> customs union area (~~EU), otherwise NO.
But isn't this always and everywhere the case (as Jarek mentioned before
me)?
My idea of the duty_free tag
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 17:37, Colin Smale wrote:
> On 2019-12-31 23:04, Hauke Stieler wrote:
>> that's true, the EU is one special case here. But would the status of a
>> traveler influence the tagging schema of "duty_free=*" in your opinion?
>
> The EU is only a special case because there are
On 2019-12-31 23:04, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that's true, the EU is one special case here. But would the status of a
> traveler influence the tagging schema of "duty_free=*" in your opinion?
The EU is only a special case because there are multiple countries
within a single customs area
Hi,
that's true, the EU is one special case here. But would the status of a
traveler influence the tagging schema of "duty_free=*" in your opinion?
Hauke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
On 2019-12-26 06:14, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
> However, in airports, there are pointedly "duty free" shops for (all)
> travelers. that have no ability to collect taxes for any purchase, so
> shop=gifts + duty_free=designated might be a good way to do it for these
> specialty shops in
Hi Javbw,
so you suggest only a "duty_free=" key with the values "yes|no|designated"?
I like your idea of having only one key "duty_free" but I would choose
different values. The tags "duty_free=yes" vs. "=designated" might be
confusing.
My idea:
duty_free=yes
E.g. Shop in
Almost all department stores in Japan advertise this for travelers, as it is
part of their standardized signage, so you will see it even in rural or remote
branches (not just near the airport or In. Tokyo. While I wouldn’t expect this
service at small shops, it is a common sight to see “tax
Hello,
boith tags look fine, except the unneeded use of a namespace
duty_free= (already exist 6 time)
tax_refund=
Regards,
Marc
Le 23.12.19 à 21:25, Hauke Stieler a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> so I think of creating/establishing two new tags:
>
> shop:duty_free=
> -> Shops in airports where nobody
Hi all,
so I think of creating/establishing two new tags:
shop:duty_free=
-> Shops in airports where nobody has to pay taxes at all (those usual
duty-free shops)
shop:tax_refund=
-> Shops in cities where you pay taxes like in every other shop but(!)
you can get a receipt to get a tax refund
Just duty_free=yes would be good for a shop in town which offers tax-free
sales for international travelers.
But the tag ship=duty_free is probably fine for shops in the international
airport terminal which sell a mix of alcohol, perfume and other expensive
gifts.
Joseph
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at
On 12/20/19 16:35, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Using shop=duty_free would unfortunately remove possible existing tags
> like shop=fashion, therefore I hope for additional tags as I mentioned.
And I think this is enough reason to deprecate shop=duty_free in favor
of e.g. shop:duty_free=yes or similar.
Hi Graeme,
unfortunately the situation is slightly different in Germany. Those
shops I meant are no duty-free shops in general. According to the German
customs [0] the refund of the taxes is also only possible under certain
conditions. As far as I understand it's not possible for me as German
On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 at 00:02, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently found several stores (pharmacy, clothing store, jewelery and
> others) which offer "tax free shopping". For those of you who don't know
> it, this works as follows:
>
At least in Australia, & apparently internationally as
Hi,
I recently found several stores (pharmacy, clothing store, jewelery and
others) which offer "tax free shopping". For those of you who don't know
it, this works as follows:
You buy something and next to your normal receipt, you'll also get an
additional receipt with some tax information on
20 matches
Mail list logo
