On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:18:23 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:
Tag where it's signed, which is generally the exception to the default.
In places where the law is no-U-turn by default, I would expect to see
U-turn OK signs where they are allowed. In places where the law is
that U-turns are allowed by
At 2010-07-23 18:53, John Smith wrote:
On 23 July 2010 23:48, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
I spend a totally unreasonable amount of time mapping turn restrictions
(mostly no-u-turn) as it is, and even that is hard to justify.
I was trying to say that it takes far too long
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
Tag where it's signed, which is generally the exception to the default. In
places where the law is no-U-turn by default, I would expect to see U-turn
OK signs where they are allowed. In places where the law is that
On 23 July 2010 23:48, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
I spend a totally unreasonable amount of time mapping turn restrictions
(mostly no-u-turn) as it is, and even that is hard to justify.
I guess this goes back to the default values for a
region/state/country, but in Australia
Should we be tagging where it's allowed or where it's not allowed or
where it's signed specifically one way or the other?
Only where it's signed.
--
Cheers
Ross
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
