On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 00:19, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Connectors too are not necessary fixed.
> When mapped in OSM they are fixed by the location given. So I see no
> problem with OSM defining the socket/connector as being in a fixed
> location.
>
Don't fixate on "fixed." In
On 25/06/19 20:36, Paul Allen wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 11:05, Michael Brandtner via Tagging
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
I'd like to separate the discussions about/amenity=power_supply/
(my proposal) and the enhancement/merging of the /socket:/ and
/power_supply/
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:05 AM Michael Brandtner via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I'd like to separate the discussions about* amenity=power_supply* (my
> proposal) and the enhancement/merging of the *socket:* and *power_supply*
> key.
>
> On topic: I think it is important that
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 11:05, Michael Brandtner via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I'd like to separate the discussions about* amenity=power_supply* (my
> proposal) and the enhancement/merging of the *socket:* and *power_supply*
> key.
>
It would make things simpler. Simple
I'd like to separate the discussions about amenity=power_supply (my proposal)
and the enhancement/merging of the socket: and power_supply key.
On topic: I think it is important that information can be added by looking at
the device. This means that in my opinion socket:cee_blue= and
