sent from a phone
> On 23 Jun 2024, at 12:35, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> So I think you should absolutely have the oneway section, even if you
> also add another tag. Unless of course there is evidence that the large
> majority of routers would do the right thing.
there is no oneway section be
Christoph Grenz via Tagging writes:
> This tagging (a short section marked as oneway) is also quite usual in Germany
> for this case, but restriction=no_entry is slowly becoming popular too.
As usual, I think that
in the short and medium term, tagging should be done with great
consideration f
This tagging (a short section marked as oneway) is also quite usual in Germany
for this case, but restriction=no_entry is slowly becoming popular too.
In Germany these streets are called "Unechte Einbahnstraße" (faux oneway
street) and happen quite often there when a city council or traffic depart
On 22/5/24 01:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Di., 21. Mai 2024 um 15:01 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via
Tagging :
In such case I would typically place such tags on
a short section (meter or two) of way near end where
such restriction is applied.
the restriction is not ap
sent from a phone
> On 1 Jun 2024, at 19:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> yes, but tagging very short stretch of road (say 3m where it is not connected
> to anything)
> conveys the same info without using relations
it is tagging for the router, you add a oneway restriction
May 21, 2024, 17:19 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> Am Di., 21. Mai 2024 um 15:01 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> >:
>
>> In such case I would typically place such tags on
>> a short section (meter or two) of way near end where
>> such restriction is
Am Di., 21. Mai 2024 um 15:01 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> In such case I would typically place such tags on
> a short section (meter or two) of way near end where
> such restriction is applied.
>
the restriction is not applied to a section, it is app
In such case I would typically place such tags on
a short section (meter or two) of way near end where
such restriction is applied.
May 20, 2024, 22:02 by bry...@obviously.com:
> I could use
>
> A one-way street with a counter-flow cycle lane
> highway=unclassified
> oneway=yes
> oneway:bicycl
sent from a phone
> On 20 May 2024, at 21:57, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
> I tried that, but could not get the from, via and to nodes to work out.
create a node at the actual start of the crossing street (some meters away from
the crossing of the center ways) and split it there, that’s your vi
I could use
*A one-way street with a counter-flow cycle lane*
highway=unclassified
oneway=yes
oneway:bicycle=no
cycleway=opposite_lane
But motor traffic is allowed within the block, to go either way.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
ht
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 5:08 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> there is also
> restriction=no_entry
>
I tried that, but could not get the from, via and to nodes to work out.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.o
there is also
restriction=no_entry
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Could somebody check if I get this relation correct?
*Relation #17,613,415*
type=restriction
restriction=no_left_turn
except=bicycles
from Solano Avenue to Kains Avenue via 53062033
Kains Avenue is a two way street.
Southbound it's open to all vehicles.
Northbound barriers prevent motor vehicl
13 matches
Mail list logo
