nd related tools
Subject: [Tagging] Unsigned portions of signed routes
How are unsigned segments of signed routes supposed to be mapped relation-wise?
For example, PA 235 in Perry County, PA has a short unsigned concurrency with
PA 17 going down into Liverpool, where both routes end at US 11/15.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Still generally, you can add ref tags for routes, IMHO regardless of them
> being signed or not, as long as you can verifiably demonstrate that the
> route exists even on those unsigned parts (e.g. official documents that are
> publicl
On 05/31/2017 04:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> personally, I don't think "unsigned_ref" is a good tag, as it still
> refers to a "ref", so I would put a "ref" tag and if you want another
> tag that says the ref is not signed (e.g. ref=PA 235 unsigned_ref=yes,
> but admittedly, according to ta
Hello Albert,
as nobody has yet replied, I'm trying.
Generally, you can have multiple routes on the same ways by using relations
(type=route), see the wiki for more information if needed.
Ref tags on ways can be used as long as there is just one route on the
segment, but they fail otherwise.
Stil
How are unsigned segments of signed routes supposed to be mapped
relation-wise? For example, PA 235 in Perry County, PA has a short unsigned
concurrency with PA 17 going down into Liverpool, where both routes end at
US 11/15. However, 235 signage stops where it first intersects PA 17.
Obviously the
