Re: [Tagging] Using highway=footway as an area

2014-08-10 Thread fly
Am 09.08.2014 18:06, schrieb Dave F.: Hi http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.49428/-0.12149 I've noticed highway=footway is being used as an area across Lambeth Bridge: North side as a closed polygon; South side within a relation. (checking the history previously they were both

Re: [Tagging] Using highway=footway as an area

2014-08-10 Thread SomeoneElse
On 09/08/2014 17:06, Dave F. wrote: Hi http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.49428/-0.12149 I've noticed highway=footway is being used as an area across Lambeth Bridge: North side as a closed polygon; South side within a relation. (checking the history previously they were both

Re: [Tagging] Using highway=footway as an area

2014-08-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 10/ago/2014, alle ore 16:53, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk ha scritto: Hi http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.49428/-0.12149 I've noticed highway=footway is being used as an area across Lambeth Bridge: North side as a closed polygon; South side within a

[Tagging] Using highway=footway as an area

2014-08-09 Thread Dave F.
Hi http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.49428/-0.12149 I've noticed highway=footway is being used as an area across Lambeth Bridge: North side as a closed polygon; South side within a relation. (checking the history previously they were both highway=pedestrian. I thought that tag should

Re: [Tagging] Using highway=footway as an area

2014-08-09 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 9 August 2014 17:06, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: You'll notice though that mapnik renders them the same way. Is that part of the recent carto upgrade? No, the rendering hasn't been changed in this respect. See http://bl.ocks.org/tyrasd/raw/6164696/#18.00/51.49424/-0.12091. --