On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Problem is that while wanting things to show on the map is a strong
motivator for people, it doesn't scale - we are not far from the point
where for every feature we add to our main map we have to remove another
feature from this
On 2014-03-30 13:50, Frederik Ramm wrote :
Hi,
On 29.03.2014 13:41, nounours77 wrote:
BUT: I asked OsmAnd to render the tag, and the
answer was - quite understandable: /Only officially supported tags will
be rendered/.
This is silly. How do they define officially supported tag? There's no
Hi,
On 02.04.2014 17:20, André Pirard wrote:
BUT: I asked OsmAnd to render the tag, and the
answer was - quite understandable: /Only officially supported tags will
be rendered/.
This is silly. How do they define officially supported tag? There's no
such thing in OpenStreetMap.
I wonder
Hi,
On 29.03.2014 13:41, nounours77 wrote:
BUT: I asked OsmAnd to render the tag, and the
answer was - quite understandable: /Only officially supported tags will
be rendered/.
This is silly. How do they define officially supported tag? There's no
such thing in OpenStreetMap.
I suspect the
Hi there,
Not sure if this is the right place for this philosophical question. But
starting from the comment of Brycenesbitt to my apartment-proposal I feel this
will become yet another piece of unmaintanable data in OSM. and several
comments I got on my boat_sharing proposal just use it,
I am in the B category for my vision of OSM. I had not voted on these
because they aren't important to me and i will never probably use either
tag but the work you've done is good and I just now voted Yes on both.
While I was reading through the table of possible tourism=*_hut I noticed
that you
Hi -
I'm afraid the answer is neither. OSM is a database for geodata that
is open-licensed, publicly verifiable and not short-term. This means
it's more than just a base-layer. But it also means it's not a
database for all possible geodata. We don't include holiday apartment
reviews/ratings
