He's trying to be helpful but has done a bad job of it. Sometimes too much
information is a bad thing, especially if you don't present it in an
understandable manner.
My vote is that it should be reverted.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
wrote:
I asked the
+1
To draw a circle does not need complicated explanations.
Compass directions are needless in this context.
Editor-specific instructions are already there.
No reed to recommend the kerb with such priority.
Martin Vonwald wrote on 2015-02-23 11:02:
I asked the user for an explanation and
On 23 February 2015 at 11:02, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote:
I asked the user for an explanation and revert:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Pmailkeey003
If he doesn't react within a reasonable time, we should revert it anyway.
Opinions?
I fully agree.
Volker
I would also question the make it circular, roundabouts don't have to be
circular.
Phil (trigpoint )
On Mon Feb 23 07:43:36 2015 GMT, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Hi!
Can someone please explain these edits to me:
I asked the user for an explanation and revert:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Pmailkeey003
If he doesn't react within a reasonable time, we should revert it anyway.
Opinions?
Best regards,
Martin
2015-02-23 10:37 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
I would also
As there haven't been any objections against a revert, I reverted the
article now to the previous state [1] and again informed the user [2].
Hopefully he let us know what he think is unclear or missing.
Best regards,
Martin
[1]
The background is an osm2pgsql issue, the wiki edit itself is IMHO
mistaken see: https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/304
Am 23.02.2015 um 08:43 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
Hi!
Can someone please explain these edits to me:
Hi!
Can someone please explain these edits to me:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundaboutdiff=1142769oldid=1107975
A little overkill - isn't it? And since when is area=no needed?
Best regards,
Martin
___
Tagging