>If the cycleways coming to the crossing are tagged as foot=no, then why
does the crossing have to be tagged with access tags?
>
>Janko
If the cycleway is drawn as a way there is no problem. The problem is only
when you tag the crossing node and you don't draw the cycleway.
Alberto
_
If the cycleways coming to the crossing are tagged as foot=no, then why
does the crossing have to be tagged with access tags?
Janko
2013/4/10 Alberto
> >> I've tagged some cycle crossing drawn as a single node with
> >> highway=crossing, foot=no and bicycle=yes. I would not use access=no
> >>
>> I've tagged some cycle crossing drawn as a single node with
>> highway=crossing, foot=no and bicycle=yes. I would not use access=no
>> because it can be misunderstood and routing software could prevent
>> access to the main street.
>From your description it seems that the node might be forbi
Am 09/apr/2013 um 20:39 schrieb "Alberto" :
> I've tagged some cycle crossing drawn as a single node with
> highway=crossing, foot=no and bicycle=yes. I would not use access=no because
> it can be misunderstood and routing software could prevent access to the
> main street.
>From your descri
I've tagged some cycle crossing drawn as a single node with
highway=crossing, foot=no and bicycle=yes. I would not use access=no because
it can be misunderstood and routing software could prevent access to the
main street.
The best solution is to tag intersection node with highway=crossing and draw
On 4/9/13 9:32 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Good question. But in this context it would by obvious in my opinion - the
cycleway.
i would recommend against the approach of tagging the single node. better,
i think, to break the cycleway on either side of the shared node and tag
the way. this elimina
2013/4/9 Richard Fairhurst
> Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
> > A node with highway=crossing (or level_crossing for railways) only
> > refers to the crossing of the highway, i.e. its access tags do not
> > refer to the highway itself.
>
> Genuine question - if you have a highway=cycleway crossing
Good question. But in this context it would by obvious in my opinion - the
cycleway.
2013/4/9 Richard Fairhurst
> Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
> > A node with highway=crossing (or level_crossing for railways) only
> > refers to the crossing of the highway, i.e. its access tags do not
> > refer
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Genuine question - if you have a highway=cycleway crossing a
> highway=unclassified at a shared crossing node, how do you know which one
> is
> "the highway itself"?
>
>
And even more genuine : why do you have to tag the shared crossing no
Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
> A node with highway=crossing (or level_crossing for railways) only
> refers to the crossing of the highway, i.e. its access tags do not
> refer to the highway itself.
Genuine question - if you have a highway=cycleway crossing a
highway=unclassified at a shared cr
Hi!
2013/4/9 Richard Welty
> but what is it crossing? if you put access=no on a node that is shared by a
> cycleway and a public highway, you'll deny access to cars.
>
A node with highway=crossing (or level_crossing for railways) only refers
to the crossing of the highway, i.e. its access tags
On 4/9/13 8:35 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Hi!
2013/4/9 Volker Schmidt
How to tag a bicycle-only crossing.
We have here occasionally road crossings that are separate for pedestrians
and for bicycles. They can be even 20meters apart.
Is it
highway=crossing
bicycle=yes
foot=no
Sounds reasonabl
Hi!
2013/4/9 Volker Schmidt
> How to tag a bicycle-only crossing.
> We have here occasionally road crossings that are separate for pedestrians
> and for bicycles. They can be even 20meters apart.
> Is it
> highway=crossing
> bicycle=yes
> foot=no
>
>
Sounds reasonable. Although if it is really b
How to tag a bicycle-only crossing.
We have here occasionally road crossings that are separate for pedestrians
and for bicycles. They can be even 20meters apart.
Is it
highway=crossing
bicycle=yes
foot=no
?
Volker,
Padova, Italy
___
Tagging mailing list
T
14 matches
Mail list logo
