I also support that mass retagging of building=entrance nodes attached to
buildings.
--
Andrew
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: 13 December 2022 00:26
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=entrance
sent from a phone
sent from a phone
> On 12 Dec 2022, at 22:13, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> i dislike the idea to have tag with several meaning depending
> if it's on a node or a closed way
One could say the distinction is in the meaning, not in the object type,
there is a tag that was used in the past on nodes
Le 12.12.22 à 20:27, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
it doesn't look like to be a building but a indoor=* (root ? entrance ?)
and sometime a building:part (for 3D tag)
i disl
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:51 PM Jmapb wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
> > using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
> >
> > It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so t
On 12/12/2022 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so there
is not much hindering people from using it, just that t
sorry, missed the link https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22570
any comments on the tag? Someone else using it for buildings?
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is using
building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so there is not
much hindering people from using it, just that there was the bad practice
to use the same tag on nodes
