Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-26 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-02-26 13:24, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote : > On 26.02.2014 12:45, André Pirard wrote: >> -1 : open : "it's an invention" > It was introduced by Netzwolf some years ago because it is needed as > (when used together with a comment). It is now used over 150 > times to do exactly that (regex:

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-26 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
On 26.02.2014 12:45, André Pirard wrote: > On 2014-02-25 15:24, Peter Wendorff wrote : >> Hi André, >> as far as I know, the same would be possible with >> opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" > Oh no, please please please, let us not start that same thread all over again. > (opening-hours: how

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-26 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-02-25 15:24, Peter Wendorff wrote : Hi André, as far as I know, the same would be possible with opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" Oh no, please please please, let us not start that same thread all over again. (opening-hours: how to co

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
On 25.02.2014 15:49, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote: > On 25.02.2014 15:24, Peter Wendorff wrote: >> Hi André, >> as far as I know, the same would be possible with >> opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" > You almost got it. The use of a comma to separate rules does mean that the > second rule wo

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
On 25.02.2014 15:46, John Packer wrote: >> if you're very versed in openening_hours tagging (which I am not) you can >> AFAIK even express stuff like "except every last wednesday in the month >> from 9:00 to 17:00" (something occuring here e.g. for street cleaning). > > > That's actually related

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
On 25.02.2014 15:24, Peter Wendorff wrote: > Hi André, > as far as I know, the same would be possible with > opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" You almost got it. The use of a comma to separate rules does mean that the second rule would be interpreted as additional rule (not overwriting the p

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread John Packer
> if you're very versed in openening_hours tagging (which I am not) you can > AFAIK even express stuff like "except every last wednesday in the month > from 9:00 to 17:00" (something occuring here e.g. for street cleaning). That's actually related to something I need to do here. How can I describ

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-25 15:24 GMT+01:00 Peter Wendorff : > Hi André, > as far as I know, the same would be possible with > opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" > +1 if you're very versed in openening_hours tagging (which I am not) you can AFAIK even express stuff like "except every last wednesday in the

Re: [Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi André, as far as I know, the same would be possible with opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" no need for an extra tag. Also keep in mind that two tags opening_hours and closing_hours are error prone when used both together at the same object. regards Peter Am 25.02.2014 14:50, schrieb An

[Tagging] closing-hours

2014-02-25 Thread André Pirard
Hi, I had to tag several parking lots closed on times such as Fr 14:00-22:00 when the market took place there. I raised a convoluted discussion: everyone had a different opinion about that tagging, plus strange comments (*). After more than 10 hours spent in re