I've used 'smell' on the proposal; I think more people will know that word!
As an aside, there's a playground viewer app here:
http://ant.homelinux.net/maps/index.html
which shows (as blue icons) any playgrounds created with the new
schema. It's experimental at the moment, working with a snapsho
re sensory=? to smell?
Perhaps the word you want is Olfactory ?
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
My view was that baby=yes was shorthand for minage=0, maxage=about 4 -
more a recommendation of age appropriateness than a hard limit. Also
it was intended for the equipment rather than the whole play area -
though in the unlikely case of an entire play area being for babies
there wouldn't be any r
On 15 May 2010 04:37, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Sure, I only want to use baby=yes to tag if there is toys for babies.
> This is mostly used for swings so I'm not entirely sure it's needed.
> :-)
There could be an exclusive area for toddlers, another for children
and so on, imho instead of saying ba
On 15 May 2010 04:42, John Smith wrote:
> On 15 May 2010 04:23, Phil! Gold wrote:
>> Could that be unified with other access designations? 'baby=designated'
>> or 'baby=official'?
>
> It might be confusing to tag something arbitary as baby, wouldn't it
> be better to tag age appropriateness? and
On 15 May 2010 04:23, Phil! Gold wrote:
> Could that be unified with other access designations? 'baby=designated'
> or 'baby=official'?
It might be confusing to tag something arbitary as baby, wouldn't it
be better to tag age appropriateness? and height appropriateness for
that matter.
For exam
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
> * Erik Johansson [2010-05-14 18:29 +0200]:
>> If you tag highway=footway with bike=yes then you don't make it
>> exclusively for bikes. So if you tag a playground with baby=yes
>> shouldn't that just mean that there are some baby specific toys
* Erik Johansson [2010-05-14 18:29 +0200]:
> If you tag highway=footway with bike=yes then you don't make it
> exclusively for bikes. So if you tag a playground with baby=yes
> shouldn't that just mean that there are some baby specific toys there,
> and baby=no that there aren't any big structures
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02 AM, antony.king
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for
> the last couple of months,
And you did a very good job, I've always wondered what to call those
hanging roundabouts myself.
_
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02 AM, antony.king
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for
> the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the
> ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to vote,
> cast your votes on
Hi all,
We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for
the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the
ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to vote,
cast your votes on the page? If you disapprove, please say why and
maybe we can cont
Cool - if you tag up those playgrounds do let me know as I could do
with some more test cases for my renderer etc. Also if you hit any
snags with the schema it would be good to get them ironed out sooner
rather than later.
Thanks for the encouragement!
Antony.
On 20 April 2010 20:33, Jonathan Le
Excellent work. For most of the recorded playgrounds in my area I have recorded
the information of what equipment exists in order to save a re-visit. Hopefully
with this that data will actually be worthwhile.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreet
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, antony.king wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> re
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment
>
> I'd like to get this proposal finalized fairly soon as it has been
> open for a month now. There has been a lot of useful discussion
> already which I have tak
>> http://ant.homelinux.net/maps
>>
>> with username map, password mrmappy
>>
> too difficult to find the bit we should zoom into Anthony, so how about a
> screenshot?
It's in the bottom right corner, where the differently coloured icons are.
Have a look here for screen shots:
Overview of kent s
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, antony.king wrote:
> On 20 April 2010 09:27, John Smith wrote:
> > On 20 April 2010 18:18, antony.king wrote:
> >> I'd like to get voting underway this weekend if possible, depending of
> >> course on what issues are raised.
> >
> > Have you used this tagging scheme much to d
On 20 April 2010 09:27, John Smith wrote:
> On 20 April 2010 18:18, antony.king wrote:
>> I'd like to get voting underway this weekend if possible, depending of
>> course on what issues are raised.
>
> Have you used this tagging scheme much to date?
>
> Did you notice any issues?
I've been usin
On 20 April 2010 18:18, antony.king wrote:
> I'd like to get voting underway this weekend if possible, depending of
> course on what issues are raised.
Have you used this tagging scheme much to date?
Did you notice any issues?
___
Tagging mailing list
Hi all,
re http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment
I'd like to get this proposal finalized fairly soon as it has been
open for a month now. There has been a lot of useful discussion
already which I have taken on board and put into the main page.
Could I ask you
19 matches
Mail list logo
