On 5 June 2015 at 13:20, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-06-05 13:36:
>
>> Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher :
>>>
>>> As for "landuse=residential" -- I agree that we could probably do
>>> without it. But it does add to the readability of the map, especially
>>>
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> +1. Drawing a residential around a village was the early attempt with low-res
> aerial images. With the level of detail you get from both 20cm imagery and
> open-data property boundaries, my preferred level of granularity is up to a
> block, i
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-06-05 13:36:
Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher :
As for "landuse=residential" -- I agree that we could probably do
without it. But it does add to the readability of the map, especially
at low zoom levels, as it enables you to see at a glance where pla
