Am 22.02.2015 um 23:26 schrieb John F. Eldredge:
> I think the "wooden portages" he refers to are a series of wooden
> rollers one would roll the canoe along, to avoid having to carry the
> full weight.
Exactly, sorry for misunderstanding.
Please, forget my suggestions, as I was talking about add
I think the "wooden portages" he refers to are a series of wooden rollers
one would roll the canoe along, to avoid having to carry the full weight.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can d
Most portages don't follow the river/creek so stating a side is not
usefull - they need a separate way.
On 23/02/2015 5:23 AM, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
The portages I'm talking about, people carry their canoe as they walk
along the trail, so those things aren't relevant. You seem to be
talking ab
The portages I'm talking about, people carry their canoe as they walk along
the trail, so those things aren't relevant. You seem to be talking about
something different--can you expand on what you mean?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 8:45 AM, fly wrote:
> How about adding the side ?
>
> portage=left/ri
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Brad Neuhauser
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback! portage=* was my initial instinct, but I was
> starting to second guess after finding the other tags. Cheers, Brad
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Bryce Nesbitt
> wrote:
>
>> This seems like a good place for
How about adding the side ?
portage=left/right/both
portage:left=*
Are there any major differences in construction/use ?
I know wooden portages but there might be other material.
Any thoughts how to deal with mircromapping, e.g. adding the portage as
own object next to a path. What tags should r
Thanks for the feedback! portage=* was my initial instinct, but I was
starting to second guess after finding the other tags. Cheers, Brad
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote:
> This seems like a good place for highway=path + portage=yes
> Because these are definitely still path
On 22/02/2015 2:21 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Tagging the relation containing the parts of the route is not the issue.
I am referring to the "ways" that represent the actual track a canoe
would take to traverse a lake. It is a type of path but it is on
water, sort of like a ferry route. For exa
This seems like a good place for highway=path + portage=yes
Because these are definitely still paths (and sometimes coincident with a
land based path).
whitewater=portage_way seems overly specific, as does canoe=portage.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@
Tagging the relation containing the parts of the route is not the issue.
I am referring to the "ways" that represent the actual track a canoe would
take to traverse a lake. It is a type of path but it is on water, sort of
like a ferry route. For example, the most direct route across a lake might
n
On 22/02/2015 1:37 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up. Canoe routes and their connectors is a
topic that needs work.
In the present case and to answer your question, I would prefer portage=*
This would leave open multiple possibilities for values, yes/no,
canoe. kayak, etc.
Thanks for bringing this up. Canoe routes and their connectors is a topic
that needs work.
In the present case and to answer your question, I would prefer portage=*
This would leave open multiple possibilities for values, yes/no, canoe.
kayak, etc., that might more fully describe the portage.The
Hi, I'd like to add some tags for canoe portages (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portage) in wilderness areas. These would be
trails tagged highway=path plus some tag to designate that they're used for
portaging between lakes. I have found three different tags that are
currently used to tag portages
13 matches
Mail list logo
