Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
the several images that likely exist for most objects should be
referenced. And I expect that
Ulf Lamping wrote:
There are conceptual differences between WP and OSM, but the underlying
problem stays the same. Choose one prominent photo representing the
object. WP can do it, so I don't see a good reason why we can't.
Of course we can. I'm just trying to explain that this problem is
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
... Yes, there can only be one photo to represent
the OSM object.
Why? You could just as easily use image=img1;img2;..., though this
clearly doesn't scale well (which may suggest that this isn't a good
approach...)
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Wikipedia is clearly different from OSM in that there is exactly one
relevant way of viewing a Wikipedia entry: Visiting the page on
wikipedia.org. Everything else is an afterthought, used by a small
minority of Wikipedia
Sam Vekemans wrote:
I edited the page 'image'
feel free to fix / edit/ delete
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
the several images that likely exist for most objects should be
referenced. And I expect that it
Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
I edited the page 'image'
feel free to fix / edit/ delete
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
the several images that likely exist for most objects
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com writes:
Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
My opinion is that personal preferences like that shouldn't be part of
the OSM database. No my favourite Sunday walk route relations, no
subjective food=extremely_tasty for restaurants, and no my
I updated the wiki page and put in a photo
:)
Ie. for a bikeshop, we add in the phone number and their website, as well as
their post-code, and the name translated to other languages) all of which
are invisible.
So we can also add in a url of the photo link, so then all the details are
available
On 5 February 2010 15:00, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I edited the page 'image'
feel free to fix / edit/ delete
There seems to be a number of URL type tags, is there a need for a
specific image tag? Wouldn't it be better to unify these?
eg
URI:image=*
URI:wikipedia=*
Sure, the OSM poi KML script can handle all variations.
The point is, is to find 1 that people are happy with, and market it
out there to all the 'map editoring tools' so they all will support
it.
osv:url=http:// .jpg is another one.
When people are out there 'photo mapping' why not share
10 matches
Mail list logo
