Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-05 Thread John Sturdy
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > +1, e.g. there is a cannon in Rome on the gianicolo hill that is fired > once every day at noon (but I guess they don't put a ball in) in > remembrance of the Italian unification. > I suspect most fixed cannon still in use have fixed

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/4/13 6:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: On 04/giu/2013, at 23:05, Janko Mihelić wrote: Disused=yes for non functional cannons and disused=no for functional ones sounds good to me. -1, this approach is generally discouraged: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disused it's also not

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 04/giu/2013, at 23:05, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Disused=yes for non functional cannons and disused=no for functional ones > sounds good to me. -1, this approach is generally discouraged: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disused cheers, Martin___

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Janko Mihelić
Disused=yes for non functional cannons and disused=no for functional ones sounds good to me. Janko ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 04/giu/2013, at 10:12, Erik Johansson wrote: > BTW is there a tag for cannon that still go BANG now and then; > historic=cannon+bang=yes? I guess fixed artillery hasn't much room in > the defense of today, so it's still a historic thing. +1, e.g. there is a cannon in Rome on the gianicol

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Erik Johansson
BTW is there a tag for cannon that still go BANG now and then; historic=cannon+bang=yes? I guess fixed artillery hasn't much room in the defense of today, so it's still a historic thing. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Richard Welty wrote: > On 6/3/13 3:49 PM, René Kirchhoff wrote: >> >> Hello,

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-03 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/3/13 3:49 PM, René Kirchhoff wrote: Hello, why do not you use 8 nodes? No Mapper previously used a area for cannons. Many OSM Mapper like more details. I also :) i could probably develop a fairly extensive taxonomy for cannons from the American Civil War. Napoleans, Parrot Rifles, Columbia

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-03 Thread René Kirchhoff
Hello, why do not you use 8 nodes? No Mapper previously used a area for cannons. Many OSM Mapper like more details. I also :) By René ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-03 Thread Brian Wolford
Follow up. If tagging a small area that has, say, 8 cannons, but not wanting to map them individually. What is the best tag to use to indicate number of cannons there? capacity=* doesn't seem right. Is there something like count=*? Mesi, b 2013/5/31 René Kirchhoff > Yes! :) > > see http://w

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-05-31 Thread René Kirchhoff
Yes! :) see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historische_Objekte#Kanone http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=15&lat=53.89357&lon=11.46009&layers=BFTT&detail=3&select=n1132388089 Gruß René * » Check the Monuments! «* Viele der als historic=monument erfassten O

[Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-05-31 Thread Brian Wolford
On behalf of Wedens of COSMHA-STM and talk-ht, We would like to know if it is appropriate to tag historic cannons in old military forts as: historic=cannon http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=cannon Example picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Citadelle_in_Haiti,_cannons.JPG