Re: standard-1.0.4 and standard-1.1.0-B1 now available

It is hard to locate the changes/bug fixes that occured from the main page. So if any one else is interested here they are: standard-1.0.4 http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/standard-1.0-doc/ReleaseNotes.html standard-1.1.0-B1 http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/standard-doc/ReleaseNotes.ht

Re: not working as expected...

From bug #14590: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14590 ... This is not a bug in JSTL, but a peculiarity of how a single quote is interpreted by java.text.MessageFormat. For more details, you may want to check bug reports 4293229 and 4321513 in the java bug database (http://

Re: standard-1.0.4 and standard-1.1.0-B1 now available

Since a few people have asked... You can get a link to the JSTL 1.1 Maintenance Release spec at http://java.sun.com/jstl. Scroll to the 'Specification' section and you will see a link to the JSTL 1.1 Maintenance release spec. -- Pierre Andreas Schildbach wrote: Hello everyone, I just saw tha

Re: not working as expected...

Nope, I'm not using Resin. I did however get it to work with someone else's suggestion... For those who are interested In my Messages.properties file I needed to escape the single qoute in the word "Can't"... Notice the 2 single quotes '' md.tree.label.feedback1=Can''t find the {0}? Mail The

RE: not working as expected...

You're not using Resin, are you? Resin has their own JSTL implementation, which might be different from the Jakarta implementation. > -Original Message- > From: Billy Bacon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I tried this after your suggestion and I still get the same > result. Are you > doi

standard-1.0.4 and standard-1.1.0-B1 now available

The Jakarta-Taglibs team is proud to announce two new releases of the standard tag library, an implementation of the JSP Standard Tag Library (JSTL). standard-1.0.4 Implements the JSTL 1.0 specification (JSR-052). Requires a minimum of a JSP 1.2 container, such as Tomcat 4.x. stan

Re: not working as expected...

Martin, I tried this after your suggestion and I still get the same result. Are you doing something differently? On 9/26/03 3:54 AM, "Martin van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Billy, > > I've got your example working with one little difference, though it may not be > significa

RE: not working as expected...

Hey Billy, I've got your example working with one little difference, though it may not be significant. I've got the value within the param tags instead of as value. Grtz, Martin > -Original Message- > From: Billy Bacon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 25 september 2003 19:56